-
Jul. 1, 2012, 03:25 AM
#1
what would you expect at intro?
first....NOT COMPLAINING....
today i ran intro in area 2. as i walked the course i was a bit stunned to see two combinations on xc...
the first was a quasi half coffin. downhill to a ditch which in and of itself was a "big" question at intro. then 4 strides...to a roll top going uphill. immediately after was 6a b at the water. that's right.....a was a red coop at the peak of the downslope into the water. b was the water itself and it was flagged right at the water's edge as you enter. you then crossed the water and about 5 strides out was a red table.
i have ridden to training....and have done intro at other venues on my green ottb's.
seriously....i havent' had that sort of question asked at novice. a bright red coop with a one/possibly two stride landing going down a steep entry into mucky/reedy water.
i did voice my opinion to one of the hard always present volunteers prior to running.
as i result....i show that i had planned on being a confidence builder for my mare resulted in her grinding her teeth all the way around xc and two stops at the red coop with the expected prop at the water on landing.
am i wrong but don't you normally not even see these sorts of questions at beginner novice? don't you normally just pass through the water? good god
-
Jul. 1, 2012, 03:46 AM
#2
-
Jul. 1, 2012, 04:09 AM
#3
That's WAY more than I would expect at Intro, but of course with any unrec level/event you pays your money and you takes your chances. I wouldn't expect a ditch or water on an intro course, quite frankly (though I try to go into it prepared for such things just in case), and most definitely NOT as part of a combination.
Under USEF rules, BN can have combinations on xc that have at least two strides and must be "straightforward." So, yeah, I'd be particularly irritated at a one-stride to the water at intro, since that's not even allowed at BN (though there's nothing that says the water can't be part of a combo - it's just implied that there shouldn't be a jump directly into or out of the water).
I'm all for being able to prepare for the next level, but making intro into a mini-Training is just silly. It should be open, inviting, and set horse and rider up for success. But organizers are of course completely within their rights to make it whatever they want to - and competitors are completely within our rights to choose not to visit such venues.
 Proud member of the EDRF 
-
Jul. 1, 2012, 05:54 AM
#4
Fair Hill, right? I thought it was extremely inappropriate, too. I did Prelim last year there and the fence two strides to the water was a 2'3 version of the Prelim question. I am not sure who designed this course (and I haven't done an unrecognized FH in a few years so I'm not sure how long this trend has been going on) but I am definitely going to write to FHI.
The Intro I did last week was all single fences with the water being an option of pass through or jump a small fence nearby. There was no ditch and no combinations. This has previously been my experience with this level, and I think it's what is appropriate for beginners/ baby horses. Fair Hill of all places should know better.
If you are looking for a softer, more appropriate course, maybe try Olde Hope in August? I'm going to take my guy to Full Moon, but he's proved he's ready for BN!
-
Jul. 1, 2012, 06:09 AM
#5
Wow, this description does not sound like an intro course to me. When CDCTA runs intro, everything is a single element and water is pretty simple, as it going through it without a jump. We call intro XC the "speed bump" division, but that's the point.
If the purpose of intro is to give the inexperienced horse and/or rider a very low level exposure to eventing, then it sounds like Fair Hill didn't get the message. I hope the OP completes the Area II feedback form as these comments are invaluable.
-
Jul. 1, 2012, 06:40 AM
#6
The starter trials there can be an intro mini olympics. I don't take my greenies there as I just don't find the questions are appropriate for the level.
-
Jul. 1, 2012, 06:42 AM
#7
I've seen several questions like that now at UR events. Fourth fence on novice, a drop into water, a one stride at BN--flagged with different numbers but no way to jump it other than as combination. Chevron jumps, narrows...light to dark questions and terrain questions....seen them all. And yes...itty bitty combinations at intro.
I just treat these shows as controlled schooling. So If there is a question that I think is too much for my horse, I go around it or introduce it like I would at schooling. I let them know ahead that is my intention...and do not go to a venue that would not let you continue.
Sorry you didn't have a good experience.
** The difference between genius and stupidity is genius has its limits. -- Albert Einstein **
-
Jul. 1, 2012, 08:07 AM
#8
 Originally Posted by bornfreenowexpensive
I just treat these shows as controlled schooling. So If there is a question that I think is too much for my horse, I go around it or introduce it like I would at schooling. I let them know ahead that is my intention...and do not go to a venue that would not let you continue.
Out of curiosty, would that be marked as elimination (technically), but they would allow you to finish the course?
A couple of weeks ago I did the start course at Full Gallop (Area III). They had a ditch and water, but both with optional log/roll top jumps. 9 jumps total with the last (ramp) being close to BN height, but not overwhelming. I loved this course for it gave Sterling and I the feeling of running a true course, there was terrain to manage after two jumps, but with enough time to adjust if you rode well. The confidence it provided for both me and my guy was enormous and I feel it set the foundation for us to work on BN by this year
I wonder how my trainer would have advised me on a course you describe. Either we would have done what BFNE suggested, or a lot of trotting into questions which has its own issues. It is too bad you had a bad experience for I know it takes time to build up the confidence bank account (for horse and rider) and withdrawals can be deep.
-
Jul. 1, 2012, 08:20 AM
#9
It's always been my feeling that unrecognized - you gets what you gets.
When there is only one ditch, or one water jump complex in a field, how do you run the little jumpers with the huge jumpers?
In order to give people the same chance across the divisions to get over the ditch or into the water, they have to figure out how to run the course thru those bottlenecks. I really like the idea of a little water and a big water, because you make something look more natural to a horse that way. How well I know such a thought costs MONEY....
I think a busy water complex bewilders horses! Especially a young horse, you ride up to a puddle surrounded by huge red houses and half rounds. WTF? they must be thinking. I think sometimes just passing through such a complex is a feat of great equitation on a green horse whose eyes are bugging out at this semi-town of obstacles.
-
Jul. 1, 2012, 08:36 AM
#10
Retread, they could easily have removed the Intro fence and there would have been plenty of room to walk into the water. They could easily have not put a fence after the ditch (or left the ditch out altogether) too. Both of these "questions" were ONLY on the Intro course (BN had larger versions). IMO there was no excuse and I am not going to do that level there again and would not recommend Fair Hill for beginners or green horses.
-
Jul. 1, 2012, 08:52 AM
#11
I am pretty much a permanent intro/starter level rider and I have never encountered a ditch at my level (I have seen it as an option with a coop next to the ditch or a pass through), a drop fence (have done a bank or two up), or any sort of combination and water is always an option with a flat entry and exit and MAYBE a fence 6 or 7 strides out.
I have never seen combinations in stadium at my level either, although there are occasionally related distances.
I WOULD like there to be OPTIONS of those things so I could practice them in competition (I have schooled them before) or have some fun but I would NEVER expect them.
-
Jul. 1, 2012, 09:06 AM
#12
WOW
I thought you were talking about IBN when I read your title, then thought maybe there was a new name for Intermediate? Nothing like that here, although we just have little derbies....
-
Jul. 1, 2012, 09:23 AM
#13
Wow, not going to take my greenbean to Fair Hill any time soon, she'd have a stroke if I presented her with those questions. I have a hard time convincing her the regular XC fences aren't horse eating demons.
There is a really nice Intro and BN course at Fox Tale Farm in Bumpass, VA. They are having a UR this fall. No water, a baby ditch for the BN course, one baby bank and lots of really nice open ground incase you have to convince your OTTB that no this is not the Kentucky Derby and NO you are not allowed to grab the bit and run off. *G*
-
Jul. 1, 2012, 10:21 AM
#14
 Originally Posted by JP60
Out of curiosty, would that be marked as elimination (technically), but they would allow you to finish the course?
Yes...you are eliminated. Several venues are fine with it. I usually chat with the organizer first and voice it to the JJ (if there is one) as I approach.
Fair Hill is open for schooling.....a lot. The course was set there last week or the week before. I remember taking my green bean and schooling most of those questions. They probably made the course hard like that assuming many would have already schooled them....but doesn't matter if it isn't right for your horse. There are no guidelines/rules for UR events.....it is the risk you have in going to them.
I would say to be clear....at Fair Hill starter...the lowest level is Elem. The next level is Intro. Elem...is the same as Intro at most venues. Intro at Fair Hill would be closer to BN but lower in height (2'3"). The "ditch" is extremely small (and looks more like poles on the ground) and the fence after pretty far off--typically numbered different but again, even if not....you do what you need to do for your horse.
Not saying right or wrong....just want people not local to understand. I don't take my green bean to some starter events because I think the courses are more trappy or not the type of school that I want. You just have to walk the courses and make a plan for your horse. It is also why I don't usually do much "eventing" until my horse is further along. But UR events are a great way to get started in an affordable manner.....but you have to use your judgement and critical eye at all aspects....thinking for your horse and remembering that just because it is a competition, you can say--oh well, this isn't worth pushing my horse to do at this stage in their training and eat your entry costs. For other horses...that course would be great to introduce more technical questions at a smaller height. For others...too much.
Last edited by bornfreenowexpensive; Jul. 1, 2012 at 10:41 AM.
** The difference between genius and stupidity is genius has its limits. -- Albert Einstein **
-
Jul. 1, 2012, 10:44 AM
#15
I would have had a heart attack if I'd seen that on my first Intro course. Our first one was log after log after log. It was great, since Pony and I hadn't even schooled XC our first time out.
I wonder if the course designer didn't exactly understand what "Intro" means. I sort of wish there were national parameters for the lower levels, so there was consistency. Events that host those levels could state whether they're adhering to those parameters or not.
It is entirely possible to make a water entrance fair with every level running through the same puddle. I think all the Area X events do it.
-
Jul. 1, 2012, 10:52 AM
#16
Yeowch!
That said, I do have video of my little mare, who came from Area 2, doing an itty bitty X/C course that included a jump over a teeny tiny log (like 1 foot) into water at some course down there.* She sort of skidded into it, popped over the log and trotted through the water, lifting her tail to leave her opinion of going through water 
At that level, I *might* expect to see a pass-through water, maybe as an option. Ditches? eep!
*Does anyone recognize this course: lots of fairly low jumps in a not-huge, sloping field with some houses in the background which had nice views of the little water complex.
----
"You have to have experiences to gain experience."
Proudly owned by Mythic Feronia, 1998 Morgan mare; RIP Trump, 1990-2011
-
Jul. 1, 2012, 11:55 AM
#17
Wow as a total newbie who had a great experience at my first 3 phase I would probably not have even attempted this course. I was thrilled to find out out the tadpole at Rocking Horse had water optional. (I don't know if Tadpole would be elem or intro though)
-
Jul. 1, 2012, 01:01 PM
#18
 Originally Posted by quietann
Yeowch!
That said, I do have video of my little mare, who came from Area 2, doing an itty bitty X/C course that included a jump over a teeny tiny log (like 1 foot) into water at some course down there.* She sort of skidded into it, popped over the log and trotted through the water, lifting her tail to leave her opinion of going through water
At that level, I *might* expect to see a pass-through water, maybe as an option. Ditches? eep!
*Does anyone recognize this course: lots of fairly low jumps in a not-huge, sloping field with some houses in the background which had nice views of the little water complex.
Do you have it online? A link perhaps? This is Carousel Farms, near Wilmington, DE. It has an event put on by DVCTA of PA.
http://s233.photobucket.com/albums/e...untry%20jumps/
However they've utilized a recognized course designer since then and the jumps now are different.
Last edited by retreadeventer; Jul. 1, 2012 at 01:16 PM.
Reason: add the link
-
Jul. 1, 2012, 01:40 PM
#19
 Originally Posted by retreadeventer
Do you have it online? A link perhaps? This is Carousel Farms, near Wilmington, DE. It has an event put on by DVCTA of PA.
http://s233.photobucket.com/albums/e...untry%20jumps/
However they've utilized a recognized course designer since then and the jumps now are different.
I don't think that's it. The course in my video has much more slope (though most jumping efforts were oriented uphill, which is a bit easier for the tadpole level horses and riders.) And it would be in Virginia or Maryland.
At my one and only horse trials (Green Acres in Madbury, NH), the elementary level did not include the water, and they had a ditch flagged so you could either jump the little ditch, or the small log next to it. Given Trump's fear of water, I was very happy to not have to deal with it. I think we jumped the ditch.
Last edited by quietann; Jul. 1, 2012 at 09:36 PM.
----
"You have to have experiences to gain experience."
Proudly owned by Mythic Feronia, 1998 Morgan mare; RIP Trump, 1990-2011
-
Jul. 1, 2012, 04:13 PM
#20
I'm not a big fan of Intro and Elementary being mini Burghley courses. And I find that even if the unrecognized divisions have ok xc courses then the stadium will get you. People should bear in mind that a stadium course does not necessarily get better as you add more and more rollbacks. It seems harder and harder to find courses that are appropriate for green horses and riders
Similar Threads
-
By Manni01 in forum Dressage
Replies: 13
Last Post: Jun. 25, 2011, 07:56 AM
-
By fur ball in forum Dressage
Replies: 181
Last Post: Jun. 21, 2011, 01:01 PM
-
By Galley in forum Dressage
Replies: 76
Last Post: Oct. 1, 2009, 10:16 PM
-
By mary m. in forum Off Course
Replies: 12
Last Post: Jul. 28, 2009, 07:19 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|