The Chronicle of the Horse
MagazineNewsHorse SportsHorse CareCOTH StoreVoicesThe Chronicle UntackedMarketplaceDates & Results
 
Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 157
  1. #41
    Join Date
    Aug. 5, 2001
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    72

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Weatherford:
    From Nancy Jaffer's colimn in the Star Ledger:

    Quote: "Once the matter is settled, Leone expressed confidence in the team's ability to rebound financially. "<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    No offense intended to the individual members/donors out there, but should the Team be named NGB, it appears it's going to be business as usual for Standish, Piwowar, Wolf, etc.

    Very sad.



  2. #42
    Join Date
    Jan. 26, 2000
    Posts
    666

    Default

    And I live in NJ and worked in NY in a professional Financial position. My husband continues to work in the International Financial arena and HE was shocked at these salaries.



  3. #43
    Join Date
    May. 17, 2000
    Location
    Where am I and what am I doing in this handbasket?
    Posts
    23,329

    Default

    It's not so much how much you get paid that concerns me (I've seen the CEO's job, and quite frankly, I don't want it [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_wink.gif[/img] ). It's what you do to earn your salary that concerns me.

    Quite frankly, those salaries could have been cut in half, and I would still be disappointed with the results.
    Definition of "Horse": a 4 legged mammal looking for an inconvenient place and expensive way to die. Any day they choose not to execute the Master Plan is just more time to perfect it. Be Very Afraid.



  4. #44
    Weatherford is offline Schoolmaster Premium Member
    Original Poster
    Join Date
    Aug. 10, 1999
    Location
    Ireland & sometimes the US ;)
    Posts
    11,068

    Default

    may be ignored, but is HIGH on the IRS's list of things to examine. They call it "Intermediate Sanctions" I find especially interesting the three IRS criteria found near the bottom.

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>
    About Intermediate Sanctions
    Note: The following discussion is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to serve as legal or tax advice. For specific information about excise taxes on excess benefit transactions ("intermediate sanctions"), consult your attorney or tax adviser.

    Intermediate sanctions, known formally as "excise taxes on excess benefit transactions," are fines that the Internal Revenue Service imposes when particular individuals associated with a tax-exempt organization receive compensation or benefits that exceed the value of services, goods, or donations they have provided the organization.

    Intermediate sanctions fall under Section 4958 of the Internal Revenue Code and can be levied on excess benefit transactions that occurred on or after September 14, 1995.

    Background

    Congress created intermediate sanctions on July 30, 1996, as part of the Taxpayer Bill of Rights 2. Before then, the IRS had only two ways to respond to excess benefit transactions: (1) ignore the transgression or (2) revoke the nonprofit's tax-exempt status.

    In many cases, revoking an organization's nonprofit status was seen as too severe a penality, partially because it punished innocent parties in the organization and the people the nonprofit served. Ignoring excess benefits transactions was equally unsatisfactory, however. Intermediate sanctions fall between the two extremes and penalize the offenders rather than the entire organization and its beneficiaries.

    On January 10, 2001, the Treasury Department issued temporary regulations relating to intermediate sanctions; the temporary regulations will remain in force through January 9, 2004.


    Individuals Affected by Intermediate Sanctions

    Only persons who are "in a position to exercise substantial influence over the affairs of" a 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization and their family members are subject to intermediate sanctions. The law terms such individuals "disqualified persons." They include, but are not limited to:

    A nonprofit organization's founder, president, chief executive officer, chief operating officer, treasurer, and chief financial officer
    Voting members of a nonprofit's governing body
    Persons with more than 35 percent of a nonprofit organization's combined voting power, profits, or beneficial interests
    Substantial contributors
    A disqualified person's spouse
    A disqualified person's siblings, ancestors, children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren, and their spouses
    Organization managers who "knowingly, willfully, and without reasonable cause" participate in an excess benefit transaction can also be subject to intermediate sanctions.

    Amount of Penalty

    For disqualified persons, the excise tax for each excess benefit transaction is 25 percent of the amount over the true value of the services or item. An additional 200 percent can be charged if the excess benefit is not corrected by a certain date.

    Organization managers who "knowingly, willfully, and without reasonable cause" participate in an excess benefit transaction are liable for 10 percent of the excess, not to exceed $10,000 per transaction.

    Rebuttable Presumption

    The regulations define three criteria that can be used to establish that a transaction was not an excess benefit transaction:

    The transaction was approved in advance by an authorized body of the nonprofit organization composed of individuals who do not have a conflict of interest
    The authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate data, such as a compensation study or proof of fair market value, as to comparability before making its decision
    The authorized body adequately documented the basis for its determination at the time it made its decision.
    If these criteria are met, it becomes the IRS's responsibility to prove that an excess benefit transaction was made.

    For More Information

    Steven T. Miller, director of Exempt Organizations at the IRS, has written an analysis of the intermediate sanction regulations. It is available on the IRS Web site at http://www.irs.gov/bus_info/eo/m4958art.pdf.
    A thorough discussion about intermediate sanctions, including examples of what is and is not an excess benefit transaction and who is and is not considered a disqualified person, precedes the temporary regulations in the Federal Register. The discussion and the regulations are available on the U.S. Government Printing Office Web site at http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-...r10ja01-31.pdf. (The document may take a few minutes to load.)
    Sources

    Taxpayer Bill of Rights 2. U.S. Statutes at Large 110 (1452-1481.)

    U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service. 26 CFR Parts 53, 301 and 602: Excise Taxes on Excess Benefit Transactions; Final Rule and Proposed Rule. Federal Register 66, no. 7 (January 10, 2001): 2144-2172.

    Suzanne E. Coffman, June 2001
    � 2001, Philanthropic Research, Inc.
    <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
    co-author of 101 Jumping Exercises & The Rider's Fitness Program; Soon to come: Dead Ringer - a tale of equine mystery and intrique! Former Moderator!



  5. #45
    Join Date
    Jan. 26, 2000
    Posts
    666

    Default

    the legal advise the USET has paid for to date, I'd have to presume their accounting knowledge of IRS standards is probably on the same level.



  6. #46
    Join Date
    Feb. 24, 1999
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    16,625

    Default

    Just a reminder, folks... you are welcome to post facts (see the BB rules for definition of a "fact" [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_wink.gif[/img] ) and you're welcome to express an opinion about facts that others have presented.

    But the direction some of these threads are taking isn't really sitting too well with me. Remember, no allegations of wrongdoing are allowed on the BB unless they've appeared in print, or charges have been filed in court.

    There's a LOT of information on Guidestar about both USET and AHSA. Please, let's keep discussion to concrete information like that.

    Thanks! [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif[/img]



  7. #47
    Join Date
    Jan. 26, 2000
    Posts
    666

    Default

    So far this thread has had invaluable references and information and many people have benefited from finding out they CAN have access to information and there ARE regulations governing how non-profits handle their business. Opinions about whether people feel salaries are appropriate for the job performed are important when it's a organization that involves a sport we all are involved with. Perhaps if the information were open and discussed in years past - the matters wouldn't be so shocking and would have come with justification for the business decisions governing them. Or...the lack thereof.



  8. #48
    Join Date
    Feb. 24, 1999
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    16,625

    Default

    As I said, opinions are fine. As are discussions of documented facts.

    What makes me uneasy are the "I heard..." and "Supposedly..." type references. I don't want these threads to be seen as invitations to air every rumor anyone has ever heard about officials at the USET.

    I've been following all the threads carefully, and haven't seen anything that I think necessitates editing or deleting... yet. But I just wanted to remind everyone that they need to be sure anything they post is within the BB guidelines.

    I'll bump up the last post on BB rules, for those who aren't familiar with them.



  9. #49
    Join Date
    Feb. 1, 2001
    Location
    Finally...back in civilization, more or less
    Posts
    11,369

    Default

    Thank you for the info on intermediate sanctions. In my (relatively uneducated) opinion, the USET may have a problem with those salaries if they are challenged on that score.

    By any chance do you know what triggers an IRS investigation of this nature?? (sorry if I missed this info - my legal/tax reading skills are marginal at best.)
    **********
    We move pretty fast for some rabid garden snails.
    -PaulaEdwina



  10. #50
    Join Date
    Oct. 2, 1999
    Location
    Mendocino County, CA: Turkey Vulture HQ
    Posts
    14,085

    Default

    The AHSA doesn't report anyone receiving over $100k in direct compensation in 1998 (which is listed as the 1999 return on Guidestar). The highest paid employee is Dr. Lengel, the vet running the drugs & meds program, at $93,724.

    Also interesting is that the USET reports approximately $200,000 in legal expenses for that year. I'm not sure for what. The AHSA reports around $600,000 - however, as a regulatory body, I would expect that they would need a fair amount of legal advice related to rule violations and drug & med programs.

    Buried in the attachments (page 14 of the PDF) of the USET return is the names of all the athletes receiving grants, and the amount. I think it's interesting that only occasionally do multiple athletes receive the same amount, and that the amounts vary rather wildly, with some getting around $25,000, some at $12,000, and a few at $35,000. The total to 27 athletes listed is $794,474. I imagine some of the difference is due to grants that were earmarked for specific athletes by the donor.
    If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket



  11. #51
    Weatherford is offline Schoolmaster Premium Member
    Original Poster
    Join Date
    Aug. 10, 1999
    Location
    Ireland & sometimes the US ;)
    Posts
    11,068

    Default

    Sorry, Susan, I do not know. Will try to find out.
    co-author of 101 Jumping Exercises & The Rider's Fitness Program; Soon to come: Dead Ringer - a tale of equine mystery and intrique! Former Moderator!



  12. #52
    Join Date
    Aug. 5, 2001
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    72

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Erin:

    What makes me uneasy are the "I heard..." and "Supposedly..." type references. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I for one would like to sincerely thank you Erin and all of you contributing to this thread. I'm expecting my husband to file for divorce any day now because I can't seem to stop logging on to TCOTH BBs!

    Saying as my family has received calls from Team supporters asking if any of us know who Bostonian is - I can only imagine that - as administrator of this thread - you might be under a bit of pressure to keep this discussion within the parameters set by your rules.

    With that said, I would like to add that before your post from guidestar.com, I had only heard (from reliable sources) that the Team's executives were supposedly making such large salaries.

    Moreover, nobody would care if their professional performance indeed justified such INCREDIBLE compensation (annual INCREASE in membership/funding), or if they weren't forcing USA Equestrian to spend its members charitable contributions to DEFEND their status as our Country's NGB.

    As so many have remarked, they brought this kind of discussion on themselves.



  13. #53
    Weatherford is offline Schoolmaster Premium Member
    Original Poster
    Join Date
    Aug. 10, 1999
    Location
    Ireland & sometimes the US ;)
    Posts
    11,068

    Default

    http://www.afj.org/fai/intermed.html

    http://www.copilevitz-canter.com/intsanct.htm

    These were the first couple I found -there are plenty more for those who want to do the search.
    co-author of 101 Jumping Exercises & The Rider's Fitness Program; Soon to come: Dead Ringer - a tale of equine mystery and intrique! Former Moderator!



  14. #54
    Join Date
    May. 15, 1999
    Location
    The top of Schooley's Mountain, NJ
    Posts
    12,539

    Default

    It seems to me that the owners are really the ones who are getting the benefits. The money from the USET reduces their cost while improving their profits for the sale of the horse.

    I'd also like to see a break-down of the percentages that are used for management and supervision versus that for participation by the athletes. It seems to me that if each athlete is actually a trainer who was selected by an owner they require less supervision and coaching than if it were a team of neophytes. That would remove the need for extensive costs at the top management level.

    Those figures regarding the amount for each athlete are most interesting and may give us a key to understanding the structure of the present USET.



  15. #55
    Join Date
    Jan. 27, 2000
    Location
    On Blue Run
    Posts
    1,489

    Default

    and I fail to see the importance of such.

    Most, if not all of medal winners would not have had the opportunity to do so without the generosity of their owners.



  16. #56
    Join Date
    Jan. 12, 2000
    Location
    southampton,ny
    Posts
    2,348

    Default

    USET is really trying to discover who BOSTONIAN is?? so what if they do will there be threats what???
    Brilyntrip



  17. #57
    Join Date
    Jan. 26, 2000
    Posts
    666

    Default

    Has everyone received their proxy for the Sept. 12th meeting? I haven't and am wondering who else has. I live in NJ so have to believe I should have had it delivered by now.



  18. #58
    Join Date
    Feb. 12, 2000
    Location
    The heart and soul of Silicon Valley/Valley of the Heart\'s Delight....Sunnyvale, CA
    Posts
    3,087

    Default

    Ilona,
    I got mine here in California yesterday, 9/4.
    And you in NJ haven't gotten yours yet? Go figure.... [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_wink.gif[/img]
    In Honor of dublin aka Dee Dee 07/24/53-02/07/03
    ~~~~~
    \"Of course, that\'s just my opinion. I could be wrong.\" - Dennis Miller
    *Go Bruins - Go Niners*



  19. #59
    Join Date
    Jan. 12, 2000
    Location
    southampton,ny
    Posts
    2,348

    Default

    just curious ? the whole thing is beginning to um....be so childish that I can only shake my head in astonishment!
    Brilyntrip



  20. #60
    Join Date
    Aug. 5, 2001
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    72

    Default

    Perhaps it's time to give them a call?!

    Chances are it's in the same bin as your tax return - I heard, strike that, CNN reported your region's post-master was having a bit of trouble locationg those too.



Similar Threads

  1. Book--USET Horsemanship by Gordon Wright and the USET
    By vineyridge in forum Off Course
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Mar. 7, 2011, 07:52 AM
  2. Sidesaddle at USET
    By MyGiantPony in forum Off Course
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Jul. 22, 2010, 07:37 PM
  3. USET final four
    By seahorse in forum Hunter/Jumper
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: Oct. 8, 2009, 12:53 AM
  4. USET East?
    By Jumper6252 in forum Hunter/Jumper
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: Oct. 7, 2009, 05:45 PM
  5. Replies: 234
    Last Post: Jan. 22, 2003, 11:53 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •