The Chronicle of the Horse
MagazineNewsHorse SportsHorse CareCOTH StoreVoicesThe Chronicle UntackedDirectoriesMarketplaceDates & Results
 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar. 16, 2008
    Location
    western NY
    Posts
    241

    Default Help from Rules Guru's please

    Trying to understand this rule regarding being judged in dressage at an event. Here's the USEF general rule GR1304 that I think pertains:

    3. No judge’s trainer nor any of the judge’s trainer’s clients may compete as trainer, coach,
    exhibitor, rider, driver, handler, owner, lessor or lessee in any Division or Dressage class
    (Arabian, Morgan and Hunter divisions in any competition) unless the relationship is
    terminated 30 days prior to the competition.

    Here's the situation: A local rider is also an "r" judge and often judges at events I compete at. We both take lessons from the same trainer (at very different levels of course!). This "r" judge told me I should request to NOT BE JUDGED BY HER at any event I enter where she is judging because of her interpretation of the above rule (because I am a client of the judge's trainer).

    What is the real answer here?
    TIA,
    Mary



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb. 3, 2000
    Location
    Nokesville, VA
    Posts
    35,276

    Default

    Yes, that is what the rule says.

    If you and the judge are both clients of the same trainer, then you are not allowed to show under that judge.

    Notice the onus is on the rider, not the judge.

    You either need to go HC, or be judged by a different judge.
    Last edited by Janet; Jun. 29, 2011 at 01:17 AM.
    Janet

    chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).



  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul. 16, 2003
    Location
    Guthrie, OK
    Posts
    1,602

    Default

    So if 2 people happen to ride with the same trainer and one is a judge, the other non-judge person cannot ride under the judge person just cuz they happen to take lessons from the same person? I know situations where this could happen and yet the 2 people never even meet one another and definitely would not ride together in lessons. Especially if one of the 2 people are hauling in for lessons or if the trainer is traveling to 2 different barns to teach the 2 people.

    How is 2 people riding under the same trainer considered to be a conflict when it comes to one being judge and the being a competitor?



  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov. 20, 2008
    Posts
    1,823

    Default

    How is 2 people riding under the same trainer considered to be a conflict when it comes to one being judge and the being a competitor?
    Possible scenario: Trainers are often evaluated based upon their student's success. Therefore, Trainer *might* be tempted to use his/her influence with Student A (also a judge) to give Student B a better score.

    There are many possible scenarios where impropriety or just the impression of impropriety could compromise the judging process. Even though it is probably overkill in a number of situations, there is rationale for the rule.



  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb. 3, 2000
    Location
    Nokesville, VA
    Posts
    35,276

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MeghanDACVA View Post
    How is 2 people riding under the same trainer considered to be a conflict when it comes to one being judge and the being a competitor?
    Because it is too hard to make a rule that draws the line at a particular level of interaction.

    And if the TRAINER makes a big deal out of theresults, the "judge person" might have a, quite probably unintentional, bias to score the "non-judgeperson" higher, becuase it will make the trainer happy.

    The trainer is going to see the score sheet, and might ask the judge person "why did you give non-judge person a score of 4 on that movement?" That would put the judge person between a rock and a hard palce.
    Janet

    chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).



  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar. 16, 2008
    Location
    western NY
    Posts
    241

    Default

    Thank you, Janet for clarifying this.

    I just hope that I don't run into an event where that judge is the only judge at the show because forcing me to ride HC just wouldn't be fair! The trainer in question lives in another state and just comes once a month for lessons.

    The rule does seem to be a bit restrictive since another judge could take lessons from this same trainer. I might not know that, so could be judged by that judge and be in violation of the rule. And I'm sure that there are a lot of event riders who take lessons from dressage pros that dressage judges also take lessons from. This could well be a can of worms. It also makes it harder for show secretaries/managers to schedule to avoid these "judging conflicts".

    Mary in Western NY
    http://www.BPEquine.com



  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb. 3, 2000
    Location
    Nokesville, VA
    Posts
    35,276

    Default

    I am not sure that "taking lessons once a month" makes that instructor "your trainer". Especially if the shared instructor is not signing your entry blank as Trainer.

    The USEF definition of "Trainer"
    GR147 Trainer.
    1. Any adult, or adults who has the responsibility for the care, training, custody or
    performance of a horse
    .
    2. Said person must sign the entry blank of any Licensed Competition whether said
    person be an owner, rider, agent and/or coach as well as trainer.
    Compare it with the USEF definition of "Coach"
    GR108 Coach.
    For purposes of these rules, a coach is defined as any adult or adults who receives
    remuneration for having or sharing the responsibility for instructing, teaching, schooling, or
    advising a rider, driver, handler or vaulter in equestrian skills. See also GR906.4 and
    GR908.
    I would think that an instructor you only see once a month would be your "coach", and not your "trainer". The restrictions of GR1304 don't apply to the judge and judged sharing a coach- only sharing a trainer.

    But that would be a good one to call the USEF and ask for guidance.
    Janet

    chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).



  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct. 2, 1999
    Location
    Mendocino County, CA: Turkey Vulture HQ
    Posts
    14,722

    Default

    If you can avoid the rule just by not having the trainer sign, that's probably too loose.

    On the other hand, likely the intent here was clients that stable together with the same trainer, but it's not written that tightly. If, for example, I was hauling in to ride with a BNT twice a month, it's very possible she'd also be coaching a judge that I wouldn't know about. Is the answer to make sure all your clients know your client list or is the answer to come up with some better language for this rule that clarifies it?

    I think the rule is fair and appropriate, but could use clarity.
    If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket



  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar. 16, 2008
    Location
    western NY
    Posts
    241

    Default Trainer vs Coach

    Janet, again you've come up with a good answer. I never thought of it as a "trainer" vs "coach" situation. Personally, I don't consider taking a lesson once a month qualifies the teacher of my lesson to be either my "coach" or "trainer". Those terms seem to imply a more than once a month interaction.

    I can see that it would not be appropriate if the person I was taking lessons from (even if only once a month) was also the judge but that is not the case here.

    I agree with poltroon that the rule needs more clarity.

    Mary in Western NY
    http://www.BPEquine.com



  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb. 3, 2000
    Location
    Nokesville, VA
    Posts
    35,276

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Black Points View Post
    Janet, again you've come up with a good answer. I never thought of it as a "trainer" vs "coach" situation. Personally, I don't consider taking a lesson once a month qualifies the teacher of my lesson to be either my "coach" or "trainer". Those terms seem to imply a more than once a month interaction.
    There is a LOT of gray area between "I took a lesson from the same person the judge took a lesson from, once, a year ago"
    to
    "I take lessons twice a week from the same person the judge takes lessons from twice a week"
    to
    "The same person has care, custody and control of my horse and the judge's horse, rtides both horses, and teaches us both".

    Clearly the latter is what the USEF intends to prevent, but it is not clear WHERE they intend to draw the line.

    Since the judge HAS expressed concern about the situation, I would DEFINITELY call the USEFand ask for a clarification.

    I would also ask them to send you a email on their clarification, and print that out so you can show it to this judge, and to any secretary or organizer that asks.

    Don't count on what "someone on COTH said"



    I can see that it would not be appropriate if the person I was taking lessons from (even if only once a month) was also the judge but that is not the case here.
    Yes, that is covered by GR1304.2 ("clients") and GR1304.12 ("instructed, coached or tutored")

    I agree with poltroon that the rule needs more clarity.
    I think we all agree on that.

    Let us know what USEF says.
    Janet

    chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).



  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar. 16, 2008
    Location
    western NY
    Posts
    241

    Default Have emailed USEF

    Will let you know when I hear back from USEF about this question. Thanks for all the great input!

    Mary

    Mary in Western NY
    http://www.bpequine.com



  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov. 19, 2005
    Location
    Lost in the Sandhills of NC
    Posts
    2,589

    Default

    Just one more thought - regardless of what USEF and the rule say, if the judge has made this request it might be best to honor it anyway.



  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun. 25, 2004
    Location
    Carolinas
    Posts
    4,984

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pegasusmom View Post
    Just one more thought - regardless of what USEF and the rule say, if the judge has made this request it might be best to honor it anyway.
    Agree with Dana, the judge made this request and you should consider honoring it. One has to wonder why you are so resistant to honoring the request?
    "Never do anything that you have to explain twice to the paramedics."
    Courtesy my cousin Tim



  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct. 23, 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH USA
    Posts
    1,021

    Default

    This could get especially dicey in the cases where you show up at a competition and find out there has been a substitution in the list of judges that was published weeks/months earlier.



  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep. 8, 1999
    Location
    Libertyville, IL USA
    Posts
    4,108

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fooler View Post
    Agree with Dana, the judge made this request and you should consider honoring it. One has to wonder why you are so resistant to honoring the request?
    I am not reading any resistance on the part of the OP. Just a request for clarification. Quite honestly, if we use USEF's definition of Trainer it is a fairly simple process to avoid running a muck with this rule. If we use the generally accepted "someone I take lessons with" it is quite easy to run a foul without knowing it.



  16. #16
    Join Date
    Apr. 26, 2010
    Location
    WV
    Posts
    244

    Default

    I've long thought that eventing hovered precariously on the wrong side of ethics. We were taught (in other disciplines) that we could not compete if we were related to/associated with the organizer, the judges, and/or the equivilent of the ground jury. I still believe that to be appropriate, and am taken aback at the number of times I see, for instance, organizers (or their families) riding at their own events or in front of associated judges. In the business world, that would trigger (IMO) competitive legal issues, at least.



  17. #17
    Join Date
    Sep. 8, 1999
    Location
    Libertyville, IL USA
    Posts
    4,108

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Almost Heaven View Post
    I've long thought that eventing hovered precariously on the wrong side of ethics. We were taught (in other disciplines) that we could not compete if we were related to/associated with the organizer, the judges, and/or the equivilent of the ground jury. I still believe that to be appropriate, and am taken aback at the number of times I see, for instance, organizers (or their families) riding at their own events or in front of associated judges. In the business world, that would trigger (IMO) competitive legal issues, at least.
    I don't have an issue with organizers/their families riding at their own events is that in our area quality events are precious (of course all events in our area are quality, we just don't have a huge calendar like Area II or III) and I would rather see an organizer participate than cancel their event. Organizing is a huge time commitment and some organizers can't find the time to go to an unrelated horse trial for a few weeks before and even after their event. When your season only lasts from May to October, losing two months takes out a huge number of options.

    Also what poltroon says below. Lots of people show at A/AA hunter/jumper shows organized by their trainer/family/barn owner.



  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct. 2, 1999
    Location
    Mendocino County, CA: Turkey Vulture HQ
    Posts
    14,722

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Almost Heaven View Post
    I've long thought that eventing hovered precariously on the wrong side of ethics. We were taught (in other disciplines) that we could not compete if we were related to/associated with the organizer, the judges, and/or the equivilent of the ground jury. I still believe that to be appropriate, and am taken aback at the number of times I see, for instance, organizers (or their families) riding at their own events or in front of associated judges. In the business world, that would trigger (IMO) competitive legal issues, at least.
    I'm not of any rule that prohibits riders associated with the organizer from competing. When I was a junior rider, almost all of the one day H/J shows were run and organized out of show barns, who naturally had their riders competing there. The judges, of course, were independent. Never seemed unfair other than that their horses knew the venue and competed out of their own stalls.
    If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket



  19. #19
    Join Date
    Dec. 1, 2008
    Posts
    38

    Default

    So how about when a course designer at a horse trial then coaches lots of students around that HT? Just curious.



  20. #20
    Join Date
    Feb. 3, 2000
    Location
    Nokesville, VA
    Posts
    35,276

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eventer08 View Post
    So how about when a course designer at a horse trial then coaches lots of students around that HT? Just curious.
    The rules say
    GR1205.5
    a. A course designer may not compete in any competition where he/she is officiating.
    b. No member of a course designer’s family may compete over any course designed
    by the course designer.
    c. A course designer, a member of a course designer’s family, or a Course Advisor at
    Eventing Competitions is subject to the restrictions of GR1205.5a and GR1205.5b at
    only the following competitions: Three Day Events, National Championship Horse
    Trials, competitions being used for Federation selection purposes, and similar
    competitions designated by the Eventing Committee.
    Unless it is a Championship etc., there is no restriction.

    Personally, I LIKE it when the course designer competes over his own courses- he learns how the course rides.
    Janet

    chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).



Similar Threads

  1. To all of my sidesaddle guru's.....
    By Brigit in forum Hunting
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Nov. 15, 2010, 07:17 PM
  2. Any HVAC Guru's Here?
    By kaluha2 in forum Around The Farm
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: Aug. 10, 2010, 09:13 PM
  3. Rhinelander bloodline guru's
    By misita in forum Sport Horse Breeding
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Aug. 12, 2009, 08:03 PM
  4. Replies: 157
    Last Post: Jan. 19, 2008, 02:51 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •