The Chronicle of the Horse
MagazineNewsHorse SportsHorse CareCOTH StoreVoicesThe Chronicle UntackedDirectoriesMarketplaceDates & Results
 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 27
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr. 2, 2010
    Posts
    152

    Default How long does it take for a rider to learn dressage?

    So I have been working with some big name riders and trainers, and their comments got me thinking of the progression of dressage riders and timeframe. What constitutes a "beginner"? At what point is one considered a "good" or experienced rider?

    Here's where this stems from: I was recently given the opportunity to train with a BNT that is hard to get time with. I felt like I wasn't good enough to bother so I didn't. He later saw me riding my horse and commented that I was a "very good" rider and he would like to work with me. I don't think it was motivated by money as I am training with him for a minimal fee and was already planning to have him work with my horse himself.

    Anyway, we had our first ride tonight and he called me a beginner. This completely confused me! Can beginners be "very good" riders? Is this because I haven't shown higher levels or cannot train on my own horse? I asked him about timeframes and he commented that "dressage" takes a lifetime.

    Anyway, it just got me thinking about how we define our experiences and abilities. What do you think?



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug. 28, 2007
    Location
    Triangle Area, NC
    Posts
    6,730

    Default

    dressage takes lifetimes to learn
    you probably have good basics and show promise.
    www.destinationconsensusequus.com
    chaque pas est fait ensemble



  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan. 12, 2000
    Location
    Proud owner of one Lunar acre! (Campanus Crater, The Moon)
    Posts
    14,402

    Default

    First, dressage DOES take a lifetime and you NEVER stop learning from your horses and your teachers. NEVER.

    Second, his terms are relative to his abilities (the trainer, that is). If he is a BNT that has trained many horses and riders, you probably are a beginner. He probably sees talent, but the distance between, say, training a couple of horses to Second or Third Level and training a horse to be nationally (let alone internationally) competitive at Grand Prix is comparable to having someone say that they can climb hills in the Blue Ridge Mountains versus climbing Everest. In that case, you are a beginner.

    Be glad. You probably will not have to unlearn a lot of bad habits. You also have someone who is able to see that you have talent and wants to help you get there--and they have a realistic perspective (and I'm assuming, approach) on what it will take for you to get there and do it well and CORRECTLY.

    Don't be offended. You're still able to climb small (barely) mountains--if you can ride and train 2nd and 3rd. If you can only do 1st and 2nd, then you really would be called a rank beginner, but most people wouldn't say that because it could be construed as insulting.

    The problem for most people is the old adage of you don't know what you don't know. When you begin to learn some of the things it takes to get anywhere near the top you'll look back and realize you were not as far along as you had thought at this point in time.

    Enjoy it! Be humble and learn!
    "Relinquish your whip!!"



  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr. 2, 2010
    Posts
    152

    Default

    Thanks!

    Velvet- Cracking up at your quote at the bottom!



  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun. 1, 2003
    Location
    The Shake and Bake State
    Posts
    11,537

    Default

    I agree, a lifetime, every time I think I have gotten it, I learn something else. I am training 2nd/3rd level, I have ridden 4th level horses... and in dressage world, I consider myself intermediate, at best. Now, in the horse world in general, I consider myself very knowledgeable. I am a sponge in the horse world, I can't learn enough.
    ~Amy~ TrakehNERD clique
    *Bugs 5/86-3/10 OTTB Mare* RIP lovely Lady, I miss you
    *Frodo '03 Anglo Trakehner Gelding*
    My Facebook



  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep. 21, 2007
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    1,092

    Default

    According to a former trainer about 9 lives.

    But really, dressage is eternal learning. And then it all depends on the horse(s) and instruction you have available, how much time you can spend doing it, and how talented, dedicated and physically able to do it you are.

    For me it took about 5 years to get even the slightest HINT of what dressage was about. But I started at absolute zero (no horse experience at all) and after two years of lessons and leasing bought a horse who was mostly unavailable for riding duty. Not until schoolmasters came into my life did I make real dressage progress. After 10 years, I think I now have about two or three pretty good hints .

    And yes, you can be a beginning dressage rider, but be a very good rider, i.e. balanced, in harmony with your horse, and with good feel.
    "Reite dein Pferd vorwärts und richte es gerade.” Gustav Steinbrecht



  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar. 25, 2011
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    5,382

    Default

    Took me 6 months to get a decent walk/trot transition and to keep it with decent rhythm.

    Paula
    He is total garbage! Quick! Hide him on my trailer (Petstorejunkie).



  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun. 7, 2006
    Posts
    9,641

    Default

    If you are green as grass and buy a made GP horse and take several lessons a week with a fantastic instructor, it will still take you three or four years to be riding GP, but probably still not training GP.

    If you buy a very green horse when you are still learning trot-canter transitions yourself and take one lesson a month, it will take you one or two decades to get to First Level, if at all.

    If you buy a Walk-Trot-Canter trained -but not necessarily dressage specialist- horse when you are learning trot-canter transitions, and take two lessons a week with a good instructor and maybe have the instructor do a pro ride a week, you and horse ought to be doing Second/Third in 2 to 3 years.



  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar. 25, 2011
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    5,382

    Default

    I am very lucky in that even though I am looking at WTC trained horses to own, I take dressage lessons on a PSG schoolmaster. It would really be challenging to be learning dressage on a horse that is also learning dressage. I'd learned lateral movements and equitation on your regular tried and true school horse (equitation barn) so I know leg yield, shoulder in, etc., but it took me 6 months to be correct enough on that schoolmaster to actually trot. Mind you I've been riding since I was a child, but am new to dressage.

    Does that help?
    Paula
    He is total garbage! Quick! Hide him on my trailer (Petstorejunkie).



  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov. 7, 2002
    Location
    Central FL
    Posts
    5,750

    Default

    I had been "studying dressage" for 20 years before I rode my first actual perfect 20 meter trot circle on a schoolmaster.

    That's the beauty of dressage ... and if you can afford it, NEVER turn down the invitation of a BNT-type you admire, no matter how much you think you're not ready!
    *=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=



  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Velvet View Post
    If you can only do 1st and 2nd, then you really would be called a rank beginner, but most people wouldn't say that because it could be construed as insulting.
    Wait, really? Do you all agree with this statement that a rider at 2nd level is a "rank beginner"? A rider at that level has to have a good seat, independent aids, an understanding of contact and collection, etc... If that's a beginner, what would you call a rider at Training and 1st level?



  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan. 12, 2000
    Location
    Proud owner of one Lunar acre! (Campanus Crater, The Moon)
    Posts
    14,402

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JCS View Post
    Wait, really? Do you all agree with this statement that a rider at 2nd level is a "rank beginner"? A rider at that level has to have a good seat, independent aids, an understanding of contact and collection, etc... If that's a beginner, what would you call a rider at Training and 1st level?

    You might want to read things in CONTEXT before pulling out a sentence.

    What I said was compared to an uber experienced, international trainer. Yep, in that case you ARE a rank beginner. If you don't know that right now, then you really don't know how little you do not know.
    "Relinquish your whip!!"



  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar. 28, 2011
    Posts
    822

    Default

    Even out of context I would still agree with it for the most part. You can still see some pretty horrible riding at those levels.

    I would say wt/training is rank beginner and 1st and into 2nd like advanced beginner.



  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar. 20, 2009
    Posts
    233

    Default

    Yep, agree with you Velvet. I consider myself a decent dressage rider in the little part of the US where I live. My horses do well at the shows, I can sit and have decent feel.....can train a horse to PSG...been doing it for 25 years....all that jazz. That said, I am eternally amazed every time I venture to europe and see incredible riding from people who are no-name (to my knowledge) but good professionals none-the-less. Somehow, seeing this high level of riding on more average horses really drives home the fact that what we consider good riding in Colorado is RANK BEGINNER on the world stage. And.....that's OK. I still enjoy the journey and still deeply enjoy every step of progress I make. Accepting the reality of the situation makes me more open to knowing how little I do know and more eager to continue to advance. Knowing I'm middling rider on the world stage gives me the resolve to NEVER, EVER sit back and think I've learned it all......then stagnate like many, many riders do.



  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar. 20, 2009
    Posts
    233

    Default

    And before I get flamed, I'm not implying that there aren't great riders in the US or Colorado. It's just that I haven't been to as many top barns here to watch schooling and haven't seen our top riders working with more average-talent horses (they usually have very talented horses). Somehow, seeing really good riders bring out everything from an average-talent horse is what really blows me away.



  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan. 12, 2000
    Location
    Proud owner of one Lunar acre! (Campanus Crater, The Moon)
    Posts
    14,402

    Default

    opel,

    It is so humbling to see and be around great riders, isn't it? In the US we often see big fish in our own pond/back yard and think that's the top. NOT! I wish more people would travel to really learn. It's such an eye opener and is really needed to inspire people to reach higher. Bringing in clinicians and watching them work with people in your area who are the area's best is just not the same. Most have worked with each other and some just really never get the big picture and continue to lack certain skills that make the difference between locally good and internationally great. You need to see that to be inspired.

    I will say, however, that sometimes taking a break from lessons and just fiddling around with things on your own with a really good horse (that's very well started) is also a big education. You need to go back and have lessons, but during the time when you're messing around, if you have feel and are sensitive to small influences you make to the horse, you can learn volumes. Horses are great teachers and learning to feel without someone telling you at the moment if it's right and wrong can teach you how to find better communication and feel with your horse. Like I said, balance it with instruction, but a small hiatus will let you know if you're on the right track when you later come back to lessons. I think this is sometimes missing when some really good people just lean on their coach and don't also grow in the area of self-checks and balances.

    Then again, that's not for beginners as much as intermediate and advanced riders!
    "Relinquish your whip!!"



  17. #17
    Join Date
    Nov. 10, 2010
    Location
    NE PA
    Posts
    219

    Default

    I was once told it takes at least 20 years to make a rider, 10 years to make a horse.

    I have been riding for 21 and still feel like I have eons to go.

    I also go by the axiom - one rider makes a horse, many horses make a rider.
    bad decisions make good stories



  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov. 7, 2002
    Location
    Central FL
    Posts
    5,750

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JCS View Post
    Wait, really? Do you all agree with this statement that a rider at 2nd level is a "rank beginner"? A rider at that level has to have a good seat, independent aids, an understanding of contact and collection, etc... If that's a beginner, what would you call a rider at Training and 1st level?
    I probably wouldn't use the adjective "rank," but yes, I agree. I'd call a 2nd level rider a beginner *at dressage* on the scale of 1st to GP. I don't think I'd even put training level on the scale, actually ...
    *=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=



  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct. 10, 2006
    Location
    Gotham City
    Posts
    1,163

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AllWeatherGal View Post
    I don't think I'd even put training level on the scale, actually ...
    Damn, what am I doing then? Simon Says on Horseback?

    I thought one of the joys of riding, in any type of tack, is that you're never, ever done learning... something my Schoolmaster reminds me about every other minute.
    "Go on, Bill — this is no place for a pony."



  20. #20
    Join Date
    May. 19, 2010
    Posts
    122

    Default

    I agree with Velvet and AllWeatherGal.
    If dressage is a journey then Training Level is packing the snacks and 1st Level is getting your foot out the door
    What would GP be then?



Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 9
    Last Post: Mar. 26, 2012, 07:52 PM
  2. Replies: 9
    Last Post: May. 2, 2011, 08:58 PM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: Aug. 19, 2010, 09:03 AM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: Aug. 1, 2010, 03:21 PM
  5. Replies: 14
    Last Post: Apr. 18, 2010, 08:43 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
randomness