The Chronicle of the Horse
MagazineNewsHorse SportsHorse CareCOTH StoreVoicesThe Chronicle UntackedDirectoriesMarketplaceDates & Results
 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 39
  1. #1

    Default query

    so, if a hunt is de-registered due to a "territory violation",what exactly does that mean??


    thanks
    Production Acres,Pro A Welsh Cobs
    I am one of the last 210,000 remaining full time farmers in America.We feed the others.



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec. 7, 2006
    Posts
    867

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tamara in TN View Post
    so, if a hunt is de-registered due to a "territory violation",what exactly does that mean??


    thanks
    There are probably some MFHA rules experts on here.

    But to me it seems pretty self explanatory. The de-registered hunt must have hunted in the territory of another MFHA hunt.



  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug. 3, 2006
    Posts
    9,642

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ravencrest_Camp View Post
    There are probably some MFHA rules experts on here.

    But to me it seems pretty self explanatory. The de-registered hunt must have hunted in the territory of another MFHA hunt.
    I got that part...I wondering about being "de-registered"

    is that being kicked out of the Shriners ? (with apologies to Ray Stevens)

    best
    Production Acres,Pro A Welsh Cobs
    I am one of the last 210,000 remaining full time farmers in America.We feed the others.



  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug. 14, 2000
    Location
    Clarksdale, MS--the golden buckle on the cotton belt
    Posts
    18,636

    Default

    Each MFHA registered hunt is allowed to reserve territory with the MFHA that may only be hunted by it or with its permission. Landowner preferences do not enter in at all. The hunt has boundaries, but may only hunt where a landowner approves. This procedure came over from England and is necessary where there are/were several hunts in the same area, like Virginia and North Carolina. In the rest of the US and Canada, it's not nearly as important because there is so much more open space for so many fewer hunts.

    If a hunt has registered an area, and (say) a landowner in that area decides to play with another hunt (there are always hunt office politics going on) AND the other hunt actually uses that area without the permission of the 1st hunt, then the MFHA has been known to and is actually supposed to deregister the offending hunt. There are some benefits for a hunt that go along with MFHA registration--insurance for landowners and the hunt, hound pedigree recording, possibly the ability to show at hound shows--so deregistration can be huge. An outlaw hunt is supposed to be shunned by members of MFHA hunts--so no joint meets, and so on.

    Territory policies and MFHA regulations on this are sources of great discontent, since a landowner can only permit hunting or not; s/he cannot say WHO gets to hunt over land that is in a reserve.
    "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
    Thread killer Extraordinaire



  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug. 3, 2006
    Posts
    9,642

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vineyridge View Post

    Territory policies and MFHA regulations on this are sources of great discontent, since a landowner can only permit hunting or not; s/he cannot say WHO gets to hunt over land that is in a reserve.

    ah...I understand now...

    thanks Viney !
    Production Acres,Pro A Welsh Cobs
    I am one of the last 210,000 remaining full time farmers in America.We feed the others.



  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug. 14, 2000
    Location
    Clarksdale, MS--the golden buckle on the cotton belt
    Posts
    18,636

    Default

    There are hunts who don't care about MFHA membership, and they can and do hunt anywhere a landowner will allow. Outlaw hunts are ones that were MFHA registered and got de-registered.
    "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
    Thread killer Extraordinaire



  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug. 3, 2006
    Posts
    9,642

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vineyridge View Post
    There are hunts who don't care about MFHA membership, and they can and do hunt anywhere a landowner will allow. Outlaw hunts are ones that were MFHA registered and got de-registered.
    soooo can you promise to "play nice" and they re-register you ??
    Production Acres,Pro A Welsh Cobs
    I am one of the last 210,000 remaining full time farmers in America.We feed the others.



  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul. 5, 2002
    Location
    http://www.town-and-country.org/
    Posts
    3,000

    Default loose-loose

    pissing matches involving land owners are never good for the sport
    more hay, less grain



  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec. 18, 2000
    Location
    Near the Itchetucknee.Ft.White Fl.
    Posts
    3,896

    Default

    ""Outlaw hunts are ones that were MFHA registered and got de-registered.""

    That not strictly true...

    Splitting hairs here,but outlaw hunts are hunts that are not registered with MFHA,for whatever reason,some of them have never joined the MFHA.

    Outlaws,in fact they are not breaking any laws.

    Many hunts started that way,and as they matured they decide to join the MFHA.
    \"I have lived my life-it is nearly done-.I have played the game all round;But I freely admit that the best of my fun I owe it to Horse and Hound\".



  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug. 3, 2006
    Posts
    9,642

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by armandh View Post
    pissing matches involving land owners are never good for the sport

    I read it as one hunt "poaching" riding ground from another...when I tried to explain it at lunch, the two big landowners here in the room went livid

    "what in the hell do you mean we can't decide who rides our land??"

    trying to keep order I said "I think the MFHA divides land up and then tells the hunts where they can go or not go"

    that placated them briefly but is it divided up like regions for horse shows ?? and are these lines immovable?? I just don't know....
    Production Acres,Pro A Welsh Cobs
    I am one of the last 210,000 remaining full time farmers in America.We feed the others.



  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct. 18, 2000
    Posts
    22,434

    Default

    The territory is merely divided - it's just lines on a map.

    The masters are the ones responsible for cultivating relationships with each landowner and like all other hunting or use of land the landowner is the sole arbiter of who is permitted on his or her land. Or if anyone is permitted at all.

    No question about that at all. The landowner is in charge and no one would ever suggest he or she could not exercise any property right.

    I thought the territory policy was on the MFHA website but I can't find it.

    I think if you called the MFHA someone might be able to provide better information. As far as I know the territory policy is there as a mechanism for "keeping the peace" among clubs - and should not be viewed as a means of dividing up landowners 50/50.

    Some landowners don't just permit foxhunters, they permit deerhunters or other hunters. So it's also a way to make sure land isn't over hunted, which would violate the MFHA code of ethics as well as being unsound land management.

    Hope that helps - but I think the best source of information on this subject might be the MFHA itself.

    MFHA.com



  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep. 28, 2003
    Location
    Wildwood, MO USA
    Posts
    2,599

    Default

    So what's the difference between a Farmer Pack and an Outlaw Pack?
    -Painted Wings

    Set youself apart from the crowd, ride a paint horse, you're sure to be spotted



  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct. 1, 2005
    Location
    Sandy, Utah
    Posts
    6,228

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Painted Wings View Post
    So what's the difference between a Farmer Pack and an Outlaw Pack?
    There are lots of farmer packs, and they typically get along fine with recognized packs in the same neighborhood (unless the recognized pack where to not play nice and coopt all of their territory, but more often they make sure they don't interfere with each other). In many places (Pennsylvania comes to mind) the farmer packs were there first.

    An outlaw pack is one that has willfully established itself in a recognized hunt's territory (often a splinter group from the recognized hunt- hunt politics bein' what they are) and in so doing incurs the wrath of the MFHA. That famously happened when Dr. Gable started a pack in Middleburg country (Snickersville descends from that original split, more or less, but is now off the 'outlaw' list).

    Presumably the hunt that got dinged for a territory violation knowingly infringed on another hunt's recognized territory. That's a no no, even if the landowner says it's okay.

    Mind you, hunting INTO another hunt's territory is generally okay- the hounds are allowed to keep after their quarry until they account for it or lose it- and then are gathered up and taken back to their own legitimate territory. Unless they have gone far and fast and lost their own staff...I know of at least once instance where a famous Virginia pack joined another famous Virginia pack halfway through the hunting day!



  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb. 6, 2003
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    14,723

    Default

    Imagine you are a master and it has taken you years to cultivate a relationship with landowners. There are things the landowner will not tolerate which are taken into account within the customs of that particular hunt. for instance riding around ploughed fields, not fording a particular creek, staying away from certain areas etc, etc. One day another hunt poaches your territory and abuses all those customs. Not good; that's why 1.) They get really pissed. 2.) There is a structure in place to maintain some order.



  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec. 14, 2000
    Posts
    2,426

    Default

    You also have to consider the maintenance that the "home" hunt is putting into those territories. We are clearing trails, building jumps, etc. So it can be quite annoying to have another hunt come in uninvited to enjoy the fruits of your labors.



  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct. 18, 2000
    Posts
    22,434

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beverley View Post
    know of at least once instance where a famous Virginia pack joined another famous Virginia pack halfway through the hunting day!

    We were out basseting one day - great day - lots of rabbits. We were on public land and knew there were beaglers out too - not a pack but folks hunting with a brace or leash. We could hear the beagles speaking so we headed to a different areas so as not to disturb anyone.

    There were rabbits everywhere - we had a good day. Beagles hollering and bassets howling long and low.... lovely hound music.

    Huntsman blew the bassets in and they come trotting up - along with some beagles! We got a good laugh, seeing these perky adorable beagles trotting alongside our noble, serious looking bassets. Then we fussed over the beagles until the other hunters drove up and collected them. The beagles were happy to see their owner and hopped into the truck but I think they were sad to leave our tailgate - we do put on quite a spread.


    Equibrit - I agree about the amount of work put in. One landowner was really ticked off that riders messed up his seeded fields and I don't blame him one bit. In my hunt - anyone who even steps one foot on a seeded field is beaten to a bloody pulp and the hunt makes full restitution along with a huge gift basket. I don't recall the last time that happened. No one wants to incur the wrath of the Master.

    Turned out it wasn't us, as we suspected. Some people had moved into the area and were trespassing - recreational riders just using all the farms around them as their personal trail system. Can you believe that? Just riding all over the place, trespassing, ruining fields?



  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar. 30, 2007
    Location
    Hollowed out volcano in the South Pacific.
    Posts
    11,160

    Default

    How do they mark such fields? I would imagine they do mark the boundaries of them don't they?
    Thus do we growl that our big toes have,
    at this moment, been thrown up from below!



  18. #18
    Join Date
    Aug. 3, 2006
    Posts
    9,642

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JSwan View Post
    Can you believe that? Just riding all over the place, trespassing, ruining fields?
    yep every day....property rights have no meaning to ATV riders in general
    Production Acres,Pro A Welsh Cobs
    I am one of the last 210,000 remaining full time farmers in America.We feed the others.



  19. #19
    Join Date
    Dec. 14, 2000
    Posts
    2,426

    Default

    They are not marked Lex, it is just something you know by knowing the landowners and communicating with them.



  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct. 18, 2000
    Posts
    22,434

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tamara in TN View Post
    yep every day....property rights have no meaning to ATV riders in general

    Don't get me started on ATV riders. The biggest trespassing problem I had was with those people. I have zero trouble with a hunter coming onto my land to retrieve his hounds or tracking/retrieving downed game. That's responsible behavior. But ATV's, hikers, kids partying - that really gets my goat. I once came home to find some idiots drinking and fishing down by my pond. Leaving glass and lures/hooks everywhere.

    When I chased them off the land one of them had the audacity to ask me for 20$.

    Lex - the territory policy is not related to the landowner's property rights. The property rights belong to the landowner exclusively and the territory policy is merely a policy within the MFHA designed to avoid internal strife.

    There is usually a prescribed method of posting ones land, but that method differs from state to state and a landowner who wants to post his land correctly should look at the relevant code section. In this state, a landowner is not required to post his land, and many people dislike posting as they believe it mars their view of their land.

    But posting still has nothing to do with the territory policy - posting is only done by the landowner to delineate his property line. It does not mean hunting is or is not permitted. A landowner can bar all, or some, or only allow certain kinds of hunting or recreational use.



Similar Threads

  1. Another TB bloodline query
    By groomsbridge in forum Sport Horse Breeding
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: Apr. 9, 2012, 01:33 PM
  2. new instructor query
    By Tamara in TN in forum Eventing
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: May. 18, 2011, 10:30 PM
  3. Yet another pedigree query
    By silver pine in forum Eventing
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Mar. 12, 2011, 07:58 PM
  4. pedigree query??
    By Cheval Gris in forum Sport Horse Breeding
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Feb. 22, 2011, 07:36 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •