The Chronicle of the Horse
MagazineNewsHorse SportsHorse CareCOTH StoreVoicesThe Chronicle UntackedDirectoriesMarketplaceDates & Results
 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 29
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun. 24, 2004
    Location
    South Park
    Posts
    3,144

    Default Explain the reason for no back shoes

    Can someone explain why it is somewhat common to only shoe the front?
    A lot of horses around here only get front shoes. Say they have good feet to start with and are just trail ridden.
    What is the physical/logical reason for not putting shoes (or hoof boots) on all 4? Are the feet loaded differently? Do they wear differently?
    A friend told me I was delusional. I almost fell off my unicorn.



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb. 10, 2006
    Location
    Middle of Nowhere, take a right, FL
    Posts
    4,438

    Default

    The front legs carry 2/3 of the horse's weight. With a lighter work load many horses just don't need back shoes.

    Horses in a pasture situationwill kick and no shoes makes it a bit less likely that another horse will get seriously injured.

    Without back shoes YOU stand a better chance of not being seriously injured when a horse kickcs you. That's why I have a brace and a fracture instead of a lot of broken bones and a cast!
    Every mighty oak was once a nut that stood its ground.

    Proud Closet Canterer! Member Riders with Fibromyalgia clique.



  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr. 15, 2003
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    268

    Default

    I only put shoes on the front because they bear the most weight and get worn down quicker. That is just my experience. I've actually never owned a horse that had to have shoes on the back for medical reasons. I did put back shoes on the horse I showed as a teenager because we were showing almost every weekend and it seemed more comfortable for him. He may not have really needed them, but I was a teenager and of course I knew everything and for all I knew, it was the cool thing to do back then



  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct. 3, 2002
    Location
    it's not the edge of the earth, but you can see it from here
    Posts
    12,079

    Default

    The mechanics of how the feet come down are different too. Fronts are far more likely to chip/crack etc., while hinds can often just grow toe forever.
    InnisFailte Pinto Sporthorses & Coloured Cobs
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Bits are like cats, what's one more? (Petstorejunkie)



  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec. 2, 2003
    Posts
    277

    Default

    Because they need the protection on front feet, but do fine without rear shoes. It can also make herd management easier, because a kick from shod foot can do a lot more damage than a bare foot. I've boarded at a few places that wouldn't allow a horse with rear shoes in group turnout. Instead, the horse would be kept separate.

    I imagine that there are disciplines in which shoeing just the fronts is uncommon or frowned upon, though.



  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov. 9, 2005
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    15,268

    Default

    a horse is uneven still if only shod on the front but a lot of people do it
    some do it becuase horse is a git to shoe on the hinds, some do for whatever reason
    sometimes the horse is so used to having no shoes behind his feet are rock hard and dont grow much as the work hes doing files of the foot so always looks as if no wear and tear
    some horses cant for what every reason its depends on the horse in question



  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec. 13, 1999
    Location
    Greensboro, NC
    Posts
    35,688

    Default

    The hind foot tends to have more concavity in general, serving to have the coffin bone higher off the ground. The higher it is, the worse footing it can take, generally, because it's better protected.
    ______________________________
    The CoTH CYA - please consult w/your veterinarian under any and all circumstances. - ET



  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar. 9, 2004
    Posts
    2,799

    Default Because...

    The horse doesn't have a job that requires hind shoes.
    The hinds don't chip & wear like the fronts, and seem to be less sensitive to footing changes.
    They're pastured with other horses and owners prefer no hinds.
    It's cheaper & healthier for the horse.

    All six of my horses are bare (4) or shod fronts only (2). One of them may get hind shoes simply because he's moved up to training level eventing and may need studs for traction. He's done quite well at Beg Novice & Novice bare behind.
    "You can't blame other people. You can't always say what happened wasn't my fault, and you know what? Even if you have an excuse, shut up. "Bruce Davidson Sr.



  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul. 9, 2008
    Posts
    162

    Default

    We have 45 horses on the farm I work at. Only TWO horses have back shoes. We only put on back shoes if they have an issue that requires back shoes. We try to avoid it because kicks from back shoes are alot worse, 4 shoes are expensive, why add them if you dont need it?
    The two horses that have back shoes have hind end issues, wont stay sound without the shoes. My own horse used to be the third horse with four shoes. I recently pulled them since he is now retired and no longer needs back shoes



  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul. 18, 2009
    Location
    Port Lavaca, TX
    Posts
    19

    Default

    Because my mare is deadly. She once kicked the hoo-ha off a pasturemate with NO rear shoes. Really not a laughing matter. She is now forever restricted in who can be friends with her. No more alpha wars. She will protect her underlings at all costs. And no rear shoes for all those other reasons already mentioned.
    I need to change my name to 2barelychunkymonkies.



  11. #11
    Join Date
    May. 9, 2008
    Location
    Johannesburg
    Posts
    518

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by goeslikestink View Post
    a horse is uneven still if only shod on the front
    Pardon?



  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov. 22, 2007
    Location
    Port Charlotte, FL
    Posts
    3,438

    Default

    Originally Posted by goeslikestink
    a horse is uneven still if only shod on the front
    Quote Originally Posted by Kaeleer View Post
    Pardon?
    Difference in weight, foot length, and traction between fronts and hinds can have an affect on performance and confidence.

    The difference is a moot point if nobody is demanding so much performance from the horse that winning and losing is measured in fractions of a second.



  13. #13
    Join Date
    May. 4, 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    14,147

    Default

    If the horse has extremely difficult feet, and especially if they are poor and flat in front, it may put more weight on the fronts if not shod behind, making the fronts take even more weight. Those horses, even if they can go ok without shoes behind, will be more comfortable shod all round and will be more likely to carry their weight further back.



  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun. 29, 2008
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    2,205

    Default

    My horse is shod only in front- this is because she was completely barefoot and we began having lameness issues, the vet took x-rays, found some navicular changes and suggested front shoes and pads. Worked like a charm. Once her workload increases more she will probably need back shoes, but for now just fronts are working fine.
    Proudly Owned By Sierra, 2003 APHA Mare
    In Loving Memory of Tally, April 15, 1983 - June 2, 2010



  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul. 22, 2008
    Posts
    1,364

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Foxtrot's View Post
    If the horse has extremely difficult feet, and especially if they are poor and flat in front, it may put more weight on the fronts if not shod behind, making the fronts take even more weight. Those horses, even if they can go ok without shoes behind, will be more comfortable shod all round and will be more likely to carry their weight further back.
    I've been thinking of putting hind shoes on my mare for this reason, since she tends to go a little heavy in front and I was thinking she might be more comfortable moving off of her hind end with shoes all around.

    At this point, one reason I go with front shoes only is that the horses where I board have been losing shoes right and left this summer and with only two in front that's two less to lose.



  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct. 10, 2007
    Location
    down south
    Posts
    5,060

    Default

    The front legs and hooves take 80% of its weight (I've also read 70% but learned 80%) so more weight and the hooves don't hold up as easily as the back. Trail riding on rocks with that much weight on the front makes a difference if the horses feet are not strong enough or hard enough. My guys are either barefoot all around or shoed on front only. Even my dressage/CT horse is just on front. Now the one I use to barrel race was all 4, mainly because when we got more serious in racing he started to stone bruise in the back and wear down the hoove uneven from the turns.
    Horses aren't our whole life, but makes our life whole



  17. #17
    Join Date
    May. 16, 2001
    Location
    Alaska. Not in an Igloo.
    Posts
    8,993

    Default

    Ugh.

    I cannot stand people who use front shoes only unless dictated by large herd T/O and pony isn't doing much of anything.
    Seig Heil Polo Shirt!



  18. #18
    Join Date
    Sep. 2, 2005
    Location
    Upstate NY
    Posts
    12,004

    Default

    Simple reason - because the horse's feet and what it is used for do not dictate a need for shoes on the back, only the front. Why put shoes on when they are not needed?



  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb. 14, 2003
    Location
    Windward Farm, Washougal, WA- our work in progress, our money pit, our home!
    Posts
    6,835

    Default

    Could you be more specific Pirateer? Give some sound, fact based reasons why you can't stand people who don't shoe all 4? I am discussing this issue with my farrier on Friday, and this is a timely thread for me.

    I like what I've heard so far from posters. A low level jumper, turned out in a group, ring that has cedar shred footing...a good candidate for fronts only?? He has excellent feet, holds his shoes well--does that sound like he'd do well?
    Proud member of the "Don't rush to kill wildlife" clique!



  20. #20
    Join Date
    Sep. 8, 2007
    Posts
    2,899

    Default

    Oh No! Pirateer can't stand me!! LMAO!!! I didn't know my horse's choice of shoes was so irritating (giggling to self). Anyhoo, my OTTB wears shoes up front and is bare behind. His hind feet wear like iron, are very concave, and are not sensitive at all. His fronts are much more sensitive so he's shod up front. We are currently doing lower level dressage and some small jumps four days per week. Once we really turn up the workload I may consider putting hind shoes on, but only if I feel it's necessary.



Similar Threads

  1. Jog and Call Back? Explain?
    By fjordrider in forum Hunter/Jumper
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Jan. 10, 2011, 06:49 PM
  2. Shoeing ? Back shoes only??
    By kahjul in forum Horse Care
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: Oct. 10, 2009, 05:52 PM
  3. Going back to shoes -advice?
    By tpup in forum Horse Care
    Replies: 115
    Last Post: Mar. 19, 2009, 08:04 PM
  4. Who has pulled back shoes before?
    By eventerwannabe in forum Eventing
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: Sep. 24, 2008, 03:56 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •