The Chronicle of the Horse
MagazineNewsHorse SportsHorse CareCOTH StoreVoicesThe Chronicle UntackedDirectoriesMarketplaceDates & Results
 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 33
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan. 31, 2006
    Location
    near St. Louie, Louie!
    Posts
    1,295

    Default Rodrigo Pessoa's horse tests positive now

    From The Horse:

    The Fédération Equestre Internationale (FEI) has received notification of an additional doping/medication case at the 2008 Olympic Games. A test carried out on Rufus, mount of Rodrigo Pessoa of Brazil, following the individual show jumping final revealed an A sample that tested positive for the banned substance nonivamide, part of the capsaicinoid family. This is classified as a "doping" prohibited substance given its hypersensitizing properties, and as a "medication class A" prohibited substance for its pain relieving properties.




  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul. 2, 1999
    Posts
    17,599

    Default

    Reuters/Guardian (UK) Tuesday September 2 2008

    HONG KONG, Sept 2 (Reuters) - The horse of Brazilian rider Rodrigo Pessoa returned a positive doping test during the Olympic Equestrian competition last month, the International Equestrian Federation (FEI) said.

    Pessoa's horse Rufus tested positive for nonivamide, a banned substance known for its hypersensitising and pain relief properties, the FEI said in a statement. Pessoa and Rufus finished fifth in the individual showjumping final in Hong Kong.

    The B sample is due to be tested on Tuesday.

    The FEI said this was the sixth and final positive doping case to come out of the Olympic equestrian competition in Hong Kong.

    "In terms of testing at the 2008 Olympic Games, all results have now been received, and there are no remaining cases to be reported," the FEI added.

    Four riders, including Norwegian bronze medallist Tony Andre Hansen, were suspended from the Olympic Games after their horses returned positive tests for capsaicin, a chilli derivative banned for its hypersensitising and pain-relieving properties.

    The three others were Denis Lynch of Ireland, Bernardo Alves of Brazil and Germany's Christian Ahlmann.

    Last Thursday, the FEI said tests on the B samples for all four horses confirmed the initial findings. The FEI said it would make a final decision in the first week of October on whether the Norwegian jumping team would be stripped of their bronze medal.

    The horse of American dressage rider Courtney King also tested positive for the banned substance Felbinac.
    With his 10-year-old gelding, Rufus, Pessoa finished fifth in Hong Kong two weeks ago but the 'A' sample taken from his horse following the individual final revealed the presence of nonivamide, a substance similar to the chilli pepper derivative capsaicin which was found in Irishman Denis Lynch's ride Lantinus along with three other show jumping horses including fellow-Brazilian Bernardo Alves' ride Chupa Chup.

    Nonivamide can be manufactured synthetically and is used as a food additive to spice up seasonings and flavourings. It is also an active ingredient in pepper-spray used for riot control.
    Least we forget with some irony now that Rodrigo finished in the silver medal position behind Cian O'Connor at the 2004 Olympics and, following O'Connor's disqualification due to a positive test for his horse, Pessoa was awarded the gold medal when it was re-distributed at a special presentation in Rio de Janeiro in 2005.



  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct. 2, 1999
    Location
    Mendocino County, CA: Turkey Vulture HQ
    Posts
    14,296

    Default

    Sigh.

    I suppose I can be grateful that this is the last result, that they promise no more.

    When are the hearings?
    If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket



  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep. 2, 2008
    Location
    Upperville
    Posts
    303

    Default

    This may be a stupid question, but I don't understand why all of these riders are doping up their horses, when common sense would tell us that obviously they're going to be drug tested. Don't they get a list of the legal/illegal substances, and why on earth would they risk it?



  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun. 20, 2008
    Posts
    3,508

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ellemayo View Post
    This may be a stupid question, but I don't understand why all of these riders are doping up their horses, when common sense would tell us that obviously they're going to be drug tested. Don't they get a list of the legal/illegal substances, and why on earth would they risk it?
    Many of these substances are banned substances and while the FEI and media refers to it as DOPING, the list of banned substances is extensive and it seems now one has to be not only a top level rider but an herbalist, chemist, and pharmacologist in order to avoid any postive "DOPING" Findings

    Tonight I went into a tack shop needing the old abscess arsenal, while I was there I decided to check out some of the labels of various products - most of these were topical agents - like shampoo, MCNasty Crib/chew stop,and linements - Would it surprise you to know that everyone of the products I picked up contained a banned substance. Oh Lavendar shampoo how nice for my horse - banned; McNasty so he'll stop chewing the barn door or his 5th rambo - banned substance.

    Did you know that Capsiacin is a dirivitive of paprika? As are Chili Peppers..If you didn't and gave your horse or put on your horse someting containing Paprika or Chili peppers you too could have a positive test! IF you share certain spicey snack foods w/ your horse as I did - could test positive. Certainly giving your horse a BBQ potato chip is not DOPING but to the FEI it is... Personally I think it's gotten a bit over the top. Now I'm wondering if this is some Plot to keep the equestrian events out of the Olympics in London...



  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar. 15, 2007
    Location
    (throw dart at map) NC!
    Posts
    4,465

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ellemayo View Post
    This may be a stupid question, but I don't understand why all of these riders are doping up their horses, when common sense would tell us that obviously they're going to be drug tested. Don't they get a list of the legal/illegal substances, and why on earth would they risk it?
    Personally, I think the science behind the testing has outpaced the products on the market and the ability of vets to keep up with it. The tests are very sensitive. I can't imagine that a rider of the caliber and experience of Rodrigo would intentially drug his horse.

    Equestrian sports are SUCH a staple of the UK - I can't believe for a moment that the UK wouldn't fight hard to keep them in.



  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep. 2, 2008
    Location
    Upperville
    Posts
    303

    Default

    Wow I had no idea that things have gotten so strict! I guess avoiding all of the banned substances has become a full time job...



  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct. 2, 1999
    Location
    Mendocino County, CA: Turkey Vulture HQ
    Posts
    14,296

    Default

    I agree with J-Lu, and I think it's important to remember that the jumpers are all being charged with their horses having some derivative of chile pepper in their systems - ie, salsa, paprika, etc. The FEI is suggesting it was spread on their legs, but there are many other possibilities, including the "no chew" substances you spray on blankets, bandages, etc. Paprika will test even though to my mouth it is not at all spicy.

    As my husband said, "They're surprised to find hot peppers? In CHINA?"

    I don't know, but it appears that they unveiled a more sensitive test and were specifically searching for capsaicin for the first time at the Olympics.

    In Courtney King-Dye's case, it's likely that there was a mistake made during all the fuss to stabilize Mythilus when he arrived in Hong Kong in atrial fibrulation.

    In none of the cases is it likely there was any significant performance enhancement or advantage, or any harm to the horse. (Legs are/were separately inspected after each round.) This is unlike the case of Cian O'Connor, where the drug found was a mood-altering substance, or even the steroids that have been found in the past, where you can make a case for long term inappropriate use.
    If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket



  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun. 20, 2008
    Posts
    3,508

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by poltroon View Post
    I
    As my husband said, "They're surprised to find hot peppers? In CHINA?"

    I don't know, but it appears that they unveiled a more sensitive test and were specifically searching for capsaicin for the first time at the Olympics.

    .
    That was my thought exactly ! It's possible that some kind of cross contamination occurred. So the lab techs go out to lunch/have carryout - would they really know that chili peppers might be a banned substance??



  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb. 23, 1999
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    4,294

    Default

    It's ridiculous that a substance legitimately used as a supplement for the coat (paprika) or no chew substances. Not that want people using stinging agents to pole their horses. (Or not pole, but for when they hit a fence.)

    Maybe they should take dental records or growth plate xrays of the Chinese gymnasts instead. Good for the 33 year old Ukranian/Russian? who now is in Germany and for Nastia Lukin at the grand old age of 18 for kicking butt.
    Strength does not come from physical capacity. It comes from an indomitable will. - Gandhi



  11. #11
    Join Date
    May. 4, 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    13,905

    Default

    Sad thing is that although the FEI will say words to the effect that they did not think a rider intended to "dope" his horse, the rules say that a horse has to be disqualified. At least a rider will come out with his reputation fairly intact, even if it is not a medal.

    In the Marion Jones case, they have not yet re-awarded the medals - they don't know how far the doping went down the line. And that was in Sydney.

    If an athlete wishes to know if a substance is banned, they just have to go to the website (WADA, I guess) and search out the name of the product. I think they are wary to say a product is approved in case the manufacturer adds something inappropriate.



  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul. 2, 1999
    Posts
    17,599

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gottagrey View Post
    That was my thought exactly ! It's possible that some kind of cross contamination occurred. So the lab techs go out to lunch/have carryout - would they really know that chili peppers might be a banned substance??
    That scenario seems exceedingly weak and suggests the lab is run by a few slackjawed unprofessional folks.

    It would be right up there with a sad argument of: finding traces of cocaine on circulated currency and thus a person was touching bills then a horse and that's how a positive reading must've happened. Sure, uh yea that's the ticket ...



  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun. 23, 2004
    Location
    Loudoun County, VA
    Posts
    10,412

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Glimmerglass View Post
    That scenario seems exceedingly weak and suggests the lab is run by a few slackjawed unprofessional folks.
    I am not speaking to this case specifically, but just fyi sample and lab contamination DOES occur, even in respected laboratories. Modern tests are very, very sensitive.



  14. #14
    Join Date
    May. 3, 2008
    Posts
    11

    Default

    I know in TB world, the testing can determine minute amounts (single molecule basically), BUT there are thresholds based on scientific estimates of a level that can have an effect on a horse's performance.

    There are outright banned substances though that "at any level" would result in suspension (i.e. EPO).

    I've heard of trainers being called into the stewards and warned that their horse tested for an allowed veterinary drug, but it was just under the allowable threshold, so they were warned.

    I think the FEI's rules haven't caught up with technology and/or common sense. The use of cayenne pepper on bandages is a common way to stop chewing, and some horses develop a taste for it.

    Paul - "Aptly Asked"



  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct. 10, 2007
    Location
    down south
    Posts
    5,060

    Default

    My only question is WHY???

    This is not some backyard show and they KNOW the horses are going to be tested so why do it??

    This is what I can't figure out and maybe someone can help me understand. Do they just think they will be the lucky one that squeeks by and the test results will be wrong? I just can't fathom why.
    Horses aren't our whole life, but makes our life whole



  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug. 7, 2000
    Posts
    3,945

    Default

    www.sms-pferdenews.de

    is now reporting that Pessoa's horse's B-Sample was (surprise!!) positive for the capsaicin derivative, nonivamide.

    One big possible argument is going to come when the FEI tries to figure out if the riders can be shown to have used the capsaicin stuff on the horses' legs--in which case, am sure the entire book will be thrown at that rider-- or whether the rider was using the stuff on horse's back,etc., as way to make horse more comfortable, which then becomes a medication offense rather than D-O-P-I-N-G.

    Only half the book thrown in that case.

    Despite the Inquisition's (excuse me, FEI"s) insistence on 'fast track'. the defense lawyers have all been pointing out that FEI was, ah, rather tardy in actually sending out any of the lab analysis, etc etc...so the Sept. 5-6-7 look to be moved back to Sept. 25-6-7.

    OTOH, from THIS release above, it looks as though CK-D may indeed keep to the Sept., 7 hearing date.

    Which leads me to believe that her sentence will be extremely light--ie, no one able to figure out how horse got Felbinac, some kind of minimal costs assigned to defendant and suspension time to include time since test made public,yadda-yadda.

    In other words, I am going out on a limb now and saying the FEI recognizes that it screwed up here and will bury the case as fast as possible.

    Who knows? They have 5 more fish to cook, and that should satisfy their lord and master, WADA...they can afford to look magnanimous once.
    one oak, lots of canyons

    http://horsesportnews.wordpress.com/



  17. #17
    Join Date
    May. 4, 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    13,905

    Default

    Mistakes can and do occur. But for most seasoned riders/athletes they are very, very aware of the rules and regulations and if they get caught with a banned substance 90% of the time they would have known about it. It is a perilous slope they are on. However, as in Silken Laumann's case she was approved to take cough medicine, but when she went and purchased it over the counter she bought Benelyn 'DM' and the DM is not approved. Simple and explainable,
    and she was lucky they understood that. She came out unscathed
    and is an excellent role model now.

    Myself, I think that there should be a level where if minute amounts, that could have no benefit to the horse whatsoever, are found it is not punishable. Even the track is looking now to zero tolerance. Some substances take a very long time to disappear from the system. It's crazy.



  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jan. 4, 2000
    Posts
    24,408

    Default

    capcaisin is a pain killer, it wasn't necessarily present to prevent chewing.



  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jun. 6, 2007
    Posts
    1,962

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Foxtrot's View Post
    Mistakes can and do occur. But for most seasoned riders/athletes they are very, very aware of the rules and regulations and if they get caught with a banned substance 90% of the time they would have known about it. It is a perilous slope they are on. However, as in Silken Laumann's case she was approved to take cough medicine, but when she went and purchased it over the counter she bought Benelyn 'DM' and the DM is not approved. Simple and explainable,
    and she was lucky they understood that. She came out unscathed
    and is an excellent role model now.

    Myself, I think that there should be a level where if minute amounts, that could have no benefit to the horse whatsoever, are found it is not punishable. Even the track is looking now to zero tolerance. Some substances take a very long time to disappear from the system. It's crazy.
    The FEI labs do not test for drug residues...they use the ELISA method...which essentially tests for antibodies to medications. It is invaluable for drugs like anabolics, resperpine, and depo cortisone which can be given literally months before competition and still have 'performance enhancing' effects. What I do not understand is why anyone cares whether a horse got NSAIDs, let's say bute, more than 10 days before competition. In the FEI veterinary rules it actually states that the withdrawal time for topical medication is very unpredictable (that would include Surpass, Felbinac and in all likelihood capsaicin as well).
    There is a pretty short list of medications which the FEI considers to be 'legitimate' with some sparse information on 'withdraw' times. One can argue that in the case of these Olympics, because of the extensive quarantines there should have been sufficient time to withdraw any medication...but without any real study (particularly with the caveat that topicals are unpredictable) does anybody really have any idea what a reasonable withdraw time actually is? If the medication is not actively in the horse's system at the time of testing...only that the meds were given at some unknown time in the past...is it actually legitimate to call it DOPING?
    I understand (and agree) that the FEI should be all about the wellfare of the horse, and that they need to be and appear to be proactive. However it seems this is a case of technology warping the concept.
    * <-- RR Certified Gold Star {) <-- RR Golden Croissant Award
    Training Tip of the Day: If you can’t beat your best competitor, buy his horse.
    NO! What was the question?



  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jan. 4, 2000
    Posts
    24,408

    Default

    NSAIDS are powerful drugs with performance enhancing effects, they are not 'aspirin' or 'bengay', I think because they are in such wide use under USEF rules we don't think they do much. In fact, NSAIDS have profound effects on arthritis and inflammation of a number of types, thereby functioning as a pain reliever, and they ARE used to mask lameness and they certainly can do that.

    While the USEF's drug policies are different toward NSAIDS, I can see why the FEI's are as strict as they are. The FEI horses are not supposed to be oldsters with arthritis getting nursed along, or horses with chronic problems. The level of work isn't appropriate for such horses, not only that, but if NSAIDS have recently been given anyone can argue the performance was enhanced and the placing was not fair. The policy is 'zero drug tolerance', basically, and I think that's why basically, the medications allowed are very limited, and any veterinary treatment during the competition has to be documented.

    I think the drug policy may seem unfair or the withdrawal times not well enough tested, and I'm sure there is room for improvement, but I think no matter what, a very strict drug policy overall is needed and justified.



Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 12
    Last Post: Mar. 31, 2012, 01:27 PM
  2. Horse at (TX)show tests positive for Rabies
    By jetsmom in forum Off Course
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Apr. 9, 2011, 07:48 PM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: Dec. 18, 2010, 04:05 PM
  4. Replies: 12
    Last Post: Jun. 14, 2009, 01:22 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
randomness