The Chronicle of the Horse
MagazineNewsHorse SportsHorse CareCOTH StoreVoicesThe Chronicle UntackedDirectoriesMarketplaceDates & Results
 
Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep. 17, 2003
    Location
    Howell, Michigan
    Posts
    477

    Default Dressage judges during the intermission

    Are the dressage judges really supposed to be talking during the intermission????

    Just had time to look over my photos from the event.

    http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3238/...33b1e990_b.jpg



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun. 6, 2006
    Location
    Bluegrass, Kentucky
    Posts
    2,652

    Default

    Shows like the Quarter Horse congress judges aren't even allowed to speak to each other after that days showing is over...Maybe the dressage world should adopt that rule. Should they be talking during any part of the show/weekend of shows....NO but that is the problem IMHO with dressage.
    Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them, humanity cannot survive. Dalai Lama



  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep. 18, 2002
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    1,533

    Default

    Every dressage show I have worked, the judges gab during every break.
    Beth Davidson
    Black Dog Farm Connemaras & Sport Horses
    http://blackdogconnemara.com
    visit my blog: http://ponyeventer.blogspot.com



  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec. 19, 2007
    Posts
    2,094

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pcwertb View Post
    Every dressage show I have worked, the judges gab during every break.

    Even during the test and between the tests they signal each other. It's a team of judges you know. And a good head of the judges make this a democratic process, and hardly never decides by him or herself that a combination receives the bell because of lameness. Specially in this last case they need backup from a judge at the longside of the arena.

    Theo



  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug. 7, 2000
    Posts
    3,956

    Default

    I wish the really good judges (and yes there are a few) would talk MORE to the other judges.

    Maybe they could instill more of a sense of decency, of generosity of spirit, of fair playing field, of sympathy and understanding.

    Maybe a little bit more of the superior judges' experience and knowledge could pervade the score sheet.

    ANd I am not just talking about the Olympics.
    one oak, lots of canyons

    http://horsesportnews.wordpress.com/



  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec. 19, 2007
    Posts
    2,094

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by canyonoak View Post
    I wish the really good judges (and yes there are a few) would talk MORE to the other judges.

    Maybe they could instill more of a sense of decency, of generosity of spirit, of fair playing field, of sympathy and understanding.

    Maybe a little bit more of the superior judges' experience and knowledge could pervade the score sheet.

    ANd I am not just talking about the Olympics.
    I know what you mean, and I also know that this is a ongoing project for the FEI. New judges are guided by the more experienced judges during 10-20 competitions. However this work is mostly done by her royal highness MW. But if this is good for the future



  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug. 25, 1999
    Location
    Holland Township, NJ
    Posts
    2,699

    Default

    I don't see a problem. This isn't Congress, it's dressage. The way a score for an individual movement is chosen is subjective, but the final score is a black and white number. It's not like a hunter round where you could say that a group stood together and compared cards and THEN picked the winners. Plus, I believe that the scores were made public in real time. If somebody wanted to 'make an adjustment' to 'even out' a final score due to a score they didn't like.... Well, yeah, that wouldn't be hard and they didn't need to open thier mouth either.

    They were chosen months in advance, if somebody *really* wanted to do something that would skew the final outcome they wouldn't have waited until the breaks between rides at the actual event.

    I'm a big conspiracy theorist myself, but I just don't see one living here.



  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun. 6, 2006
    Location
    Bluegrass, Kentucky
    Posts
    2,652

    Default

    I suppose we really have no idea what they are doing. They could have talked before the show and are just following up with the plan during the breaks
    Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them, humanity cannot survive. Dalai Lama



  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul. 6, 2004
    Location
    East Central Mississippi
    Posts
    1,404

    Default

    Here's the likely chatting...

    *chew, chew, chew*
    "Did you get the pastrami on rye or on white?"
    *smack smack*

    "Oh, I got mine on white. Can't stand all those little seeds in the rye... makes my divaticilitis act up."
    *slurp, slurrrp*

    *pause in eating*
    "Oh yeah, I'd forgotten 'bout that week you spent in the hospital last year... You know, *sluck, chew, slurp* my MIL had that and was bleeding from her rectum for two solid days before they figured it out."

    "Rough"
    *munch, munch, munch*

    *slurp, hiccup*
    "Hey, did ya'll see that gorgeous bay standing over by the in gate?"
    *chew, chew*
    "Yeah, the one w/the rear sock. Reminds me SO much of my old Cammy."

    "Oh yeah, how is she, btw? Still out on pasture board or did you ever get that stall ready at your house?"
    *burp*

    And so forth and so on.

    sylvia
    Never explain yourself to someone who is committed to misunderstanding you.



  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar. 13, 2006
    Posts
    308

    Default

    Yes, of course judges talk to each other. They are supposed to. The Chair of the Jury will discuss scores with the group.

    Only in America is there this paranoia about judges talking to people (and possible conflict of interest). It's actually very insulting.

    In Europe, not only do judges talk to each other, but heaven help us, they will even have a beer with a competitor and talk to them!

    Think about it. If you can't explain your score over a beer to a rider, you have no business handing them out!!



  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun. 6, 2006
    Location
    Bluegrass, Kentucky
    Posts
    2,652

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bronte View Post
    Yes, of course judges talk to each other. They are supposed to. The Chair of the Jury will discuss scores with the group.

    Only in America is there this paranoia about judges talking to people (and possible conflict of interest). It's actually very insulting.

    In Europe, not only do judges talk to each other, but heaven help us, they will even have a beer with a competitor and talk to them!

    Think about it. If you can't explain your score over a beer to a rider, you have no business handing them out!!
    Insulting
    Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them, humanity cannot survive. Dalai Lama



  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov. 1, 2005
    Location
    The Prairie
    Posts
    5,569

    Default

    There is frequent complaint about score disparity. I think judges should talk to each other (and to competitors) more often.
    I love cooking with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.



  13. #13
    Join Date
    May. 15, 2001
    Location
    Gilbert, AZ
    Posts
    2,226

    Default

    I don't see a problem with judges talking after all the riders have gone. However, talking about scores during a round carries the potential for affecting the scores given by the judges to later riders, intentional or not, and should be a no-no.

    In the same way, in my other sport, the Chief Judge can review possible points of contention and any recent changes in the judging criteria before the start of a round, and give his or her input on the scoring at the end of the round after all the competitors have gone, but may not say anything to affect the scoring during the round.

    And yes, I agree that the judges should be able to explain and justify their scores to the competitors :-)



  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan. 4, 2000
    Posts
    24,408

    Default

    I don't think they should have to justify their scores to many of the competitors, who don't understand how dressage is judged and don't want to know, they just want to complain because they didn't win. It's like having criminals critique the judges' sentences; that needs to be done by a more disinterested party.


    --SWEDED



  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec. 19, 2007
    Posts
    2,094

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by slc2 View Post
    I don't think they should have to justify their scores to many of the competitors, who don't understand how dressage is judged and don't want to know, they just want to complain because they didn't win. It's like having criminals critique the judges' sentences; that needs to be done by a more disinterested party.


    --SWEDED
    I know from my own experience and my clients, that it is a relieve to talk with the judges after a test. Many unwritten rules are explained by the judges to the riders. I have made so many films about judge-clinics and I learned a lot by attending them. Did you know that the judges want to see three canter strides to come back from the extended canter to working canter not more and not less etc...etc... The Dutch Ponie-, Junior- or Youngriders- team will never go to a European championships without some judgeclinics before department. Trully I think you can't do without these tips and tricks from the judges.

    Theo



  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb. 25, 1999
    Location
    San Ramon/Castro Valley/Brentwood, California
    Posts
    1,664

    Default

    I guess I will never quite understand why it might be misconstrued as a "bad" thing for judges to "chat" during intermission of a dressage show. For all we know, they were chatting about the weather, the food or who knows what. I loved the previous post that gave an example about what they could have been talking about.

    As far as riders being able to talk to judges; I never have understood why not. I guess, because most of my horseshow career was spent across the pond, and we all talked--riders, judges, coaches--I never gave it a second thought not to speak to a judge here.

    I have never seen any rule that says riders are not allowed, it seems to be an unspoken rule....



Similar Threads

  1. USEA Dressage Judges?
    By Auburn in forum Eventing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Apr. 12, 2011, 01:33 PM
  2. List of dressage judges
    By cwill in forum Dressage
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Oct. 12, 2010, 03:48 PM
  3. which USEA dressage judges do you like?
    By bigbaytb in forum Eventing
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: Sep. 18, 2010, 09:09 PM
  4. Kudos to Rolex Dressage Judges!!!!
    By RunForIt in forum Eventing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Apr. 29, 2010, 01:40 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •