The Chronicle of the Horse
MagazineNewsHorse SportsHorse CareCOTH StoreVoicesThe Chronicle UntackedDirectoriesMarketplaceDates & Results
 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 27
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan. 12, 2000
    Location
    Proud owner of one Lunar acre! (Campanus Crater, The Moon)
    Posts
    14,195

    Default Opinions on New USDF Site

    Anyone else take a look at it? Any thoughts? I have a few, but I'll wait to see if others have seen similar things. Overall, it LOOKS better.
    "Relinquish your whip!!"



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul. 30, 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    31

    Default USDF new site

    It looks nice and fresh and not too busy. I thought it was a bit slower to load than the previous one.

    The information seems to be in a bit better layout.

    As usual with the USDF there is an emphasis on 'marketing'.
    ( shopping /classifieds etc given pride of place). The information could be given better navigation if the selling was removed.

    Several usefull features of the previous site have been moved to member only areas ( eg the intro test movements - seems a bit against their aims to provide education and further the sport ).

    Other than that it looks good (IMO)

    dd
    (maybe could be improved by the additon of a 'floating' menu ?)



  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb. 6, 2003
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    15,311

    Default

    didn't quite "get" this ! http://usdf.equine.com/stallions/Ad_...spx?lid=557345


    The overall theme seems to be Join, Donate, Shop.
    Instead of "How can we help you?"



  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan. 13, 2003
    Posts
    6,852

    Default

    I feel this site and the USEF site are HORRIBLE to try to find anything on them. I find myself clicking all over the site to find what I need. Total waste of time.
    Summit Sporthorses Ltd. Inc.
    "Breeding Competition Partners & Lifelong Friends"



  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug. 25, 2005
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    11,869

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Equibrit View Post
    didn't quite "get" this ! http://usdf.equine.com/stallions/Ad_...spx?lid=557345


    The overall theme seems to be Join, Donate, Shop.
    Instead of "How can we help you?"
    Enter at A, Halt at X, extended canter to first barrel, 1/2 halt, very small canter volte, extended canter, etc for all 3 barrels, extended canter to A after last barrel.



  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan. 29, 2002
    Posts
    1,718

    Default

    I think it's slightly better than the previous version but still unacceptable. Don't they hire a Human Factors person to help with the design? The USEF site is horrible, too.



  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug. 25, 2005
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    11,869

    Unhappy

    I find a great deal of frustration with anything arranged by REGIONS, whether its USDF, USEF or USPC. Most of us seeking information about organizations or people look for them by state, not by some arbitrarily named or numbered region.



  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan. 5, 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    29

    Default

    I like it and I don't like it.

    I think parts of it are a pain to navigate. I also don't understand why when you search a rider all horses owned by them donot show up any longer.



  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar. 28, 2006
    Posts
    1,997

    Default

    It is still a pain to navigate...how hard can it be to actually ORGANIZE the content so a person can find what they are looking for?
    "The stumbler doesn’t build her life by being better than others, but by being better than she used to be."
    David Brooks



  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan. 29, 2002
    Posts
    1,718

    Default

    Right Bogey. Just look at the home page, which contains a lot of information that is NOT what people go there to find. What is the information that most members go to the USDF sight to find.....that is the info that should pop out at you right away.

    If I were the designer, I would have a Horse Search, and that search would show all information on that horse including the show results and owner. There doesn't need to be a Member section and a Competition section.

    How many users go to the site to get info on YR program, or Education Program, or 'the Store'? I say few. Those are the things that could be more embedded in the menu.

    I think people want to see show records, apply for membership/renewal, register their horse, and get a list of competitions and results. What do you think most people want to see other than what I just listed?



  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep. 29, 2007
    Location
    Northern CA
    Posts
    1,616

    Default

    Hey, I go there for Education stuff! But, overall, I agree, it is hard to navigate. And I wish there was an easy way to find a few years history on a horse or rider show results (scores). I think they are trying to put too much on the website. In their defense, they are probably at the mercy of a web support/techie person who is NOT a horse person, and it costs money every time they tweak anything. That is one problem with technology - it is too difficult for the average person to create/develop, so you have to rely on a techie, who is definately not the "average person" (that is why they are a techie, and this from someone whose little brother is a techie!).



  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec. 20, 2003
    Posts
    152

    Default

    I had a really hard time finding specific GMO information on their website. I seemed to keep "looping" into the same dead ends. And one membership type lookup deals specifically with the horse, then the rider. Why are they linked together? What happened to the separate people registration and separate horse registration lookups? Their descriptions as to the type of registration look up is too vague.

    And when I did find the GMO information, it was very outdated.

    I think they still have a ways to go. But at least they're trying.



  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar. 6, 2002
    Location
    The Bayou City
    Posts
    3,800

    Default

    not as big of a bomb as the USEF site which--sorry--just sucks! but it's not great. I don't see much of an improvement on the old site honestly...different is not necessarily an improvement. It's difficult to find anything.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    "There is just as much horse sense as ever, but the horses have most of it"



  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan. 12, 2000
    Location
    Proud owner of one Lunar acre! (Campanus Crater, The Moon)
    Posts
    14,195

    Default

    I once told them they need to test it with REAL members, but NO, they never do. Then again, a lot of big businesses have lousy sites for the same reason. You invest all that money and then you don't do usability testing. *tsk* *tsk* Any good business and any good site developer knows that you need to test it for usability--and you need to take into account the lowest common denominator and the averages, and then produce a site that gives the people who come to it what they want. It's better, but still misses the point of providing what people are looking for from them.

    (BTW, I never got a reply on my offer of assistance, and that was quite a long time ago. And it was actually phrased politely. )
    "Relinquish your whip!!"



  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan. 25, 2006
    Location
    Ferrisburgh, VT, USA
    Posts
    683

    Default

    I recently visited the USDF site because I intend to join and needed info about GMO's and was also interested in information about horse ID's. I found the site to be cluttered, poorly organized, and difficult to navigate, and I'm pretty computer savy. It took far more effort to find the basic information I wanted than was necessary. The USEF site was even worse. :-(



  16. #16
    Join Date
    Apr. 7, 2004
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    681

    Default

    It looks pretty but it's a PITA to find anything! I like how they have it set up with the links at the top of the pages, but once you're at the "other end" of the link you're on your own to find whatever it is you thought you wanted to find

    I work on the website for a GMO and one of my main goals with everything I do on the site is to have it be user-friendly. Given, USDF is a little bigger then my GMO, but at least try!



  17. #17
    Join Date
    Feb. 3, 2004
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    1,821

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ise@ssl View Post
    I feel this site and the USEF site are HORRIBLE to try to find anything on them. I find myself clicking all over the site to find what I need. Total waste of time.
    I agree completely....can't search to find anything anymore. It might look good but is completely useless.



  18. #18
    Join Date
    Mar. 6, 2002
    Location
    The Bayou City
    Posts
    3,800

    Default

    After just spending the last half hour trying to navigate the USDF site for a specific reason I've decided to revise my earlier opinion of "difficult to navigate" to ABSOLUTELY USELESS!!! Seriously.....who designed this site? Because every single USDF member should have a private go at throwing rotten food at them. The site is utterly worthless and it irritates me that even one cent of my membership money went to pay for it!!!
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    "There is just as much horse sense as ever, but the horses have most of it"



  19. #19
    Join Date
    May. 11, 2000
    Location
    haymarket, VA USA
    Posts
    1,821

    Default

    I prefer the old site. I cannot find anything on this site. It seems alot of the areas I am looking for are now missing



  20. #20
    Join Date
    Feb. 17, 2000
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    3,526

    Default

    I too found it a little difficult to negotiate and some of the links just plain don't work. I also don't have comitted to memory all my numbers so I would have liked it to have a spot that it can save your login information.

    I submitted my comments to that fact. I urge others to do the same. We might have some input on something?



Similar Threads

  1. CDS USDF and CDS?
    By Dussel in forum Dressage
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: Oct. 10, 2011, 10:46 AM
  2. Spin-off: On-line horse auction site.... opinions?
    By Anselcat in forum Off Course
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: Feb. 21, 2011, 01:38 PM
  3. New USDF VP: More of the same old, same old
    By Velvet in forum Dressage
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: Dec. 7, 2010, 02:05 PM
  4. Do 2010 USDF tests = 2007 USDF tests?
    By Beam Me Up in forum Eventing
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Sep. 3, 2010, 11:21 PM
  5. Name and USDF?
    By dressappy in forum Dressage
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Jun. 16, 2010, 01:24 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •