Nope, just refreshingly frank and earnest. Probably because I tend not to suffer fools or their foolishness much if at all.
Originally Posted by ecrklaveness
Perhaps if your reading comprehension were greater, you would have noted that I did concentrate on the issue. As for my "kindergarten style" if that's what it is, you earned it.
If you had any interest in a good debate you'd keep the silly kindergarten style stabs to yourself and concentrate on the issue.
ROTFL. Evaluated as compared to what and how many, and where?
"I'm afraid I ..." is a way of being polite. And "for me" doesn't indicate I'M wearing them, but that I've made the personal evaluated choice for my individual horse at the moment.
Speak for yourself.
That rather transpires from the sentence - how old are we, fourteen?
Please direct me to said research and exactly who is doing it. Market research? You're kidding, right. A wise man once observed that "there's three kinds of lies: Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics...... Or is it that 'market research' is your euphenism for "testimonial(s)"?
I know this because? Laboratory AND market research is coming up with absolutely glowing results in every aspect of EqFu boots, except two points related to the nature of the sole: the soft soles wear more quickly than hard materials, and they aren't studdable. This research is being done on the Norwegian market, but it is valid research still.
Please refer back to my comment on fools and their foolishness....
Why don't you bother to have a look at it yourself (Google is your friend), instead of indiscriminately attacking everything I say, kindergarten-style?
Nor does it mean that any 'real' research is being conducted.
The fact that EqFu hasn't come to the USA yet doesn't mean this part of the world isn't doing research.
Regardless, I do like the abbreviated word "EqFu" It some how seems quite appropriate.