PDA

View Full Version : prejudice and foxhunting


bovon
Mar. 2, 2006, 01:02 PM
Hi there again, I'm kind of lurking over here since I'm new to the foxhunting thing and all. I'm going out for my 2nd time ever on Wednesday and I can't wait. Sometimes I get the impression from folks of other disciplines that foxhunters are not as strict in their training of horses as in they don't teach their horses how to jump properly, etc. I had a dressage instructor tell me that alot of foxhunting horses have incorrect muscular development as in their underneck muscles are too big ,they throw themselves over fences, etc. It seems to me that to have a good horse at foxhunting means having a horse who really knows how to jump over varying terrain in a variety of ever changing conditions and also have the mental amptitude to deal with all of this in a sensible manner. It reminds me of that saying "just a trail horse'. In my limited experience a good trail horse is worth their weight in gold and I bet the same about a good foxhunting horse as well. Anyway has anyone else run into these "prejudices".

pook
Mar. 2, 2006, 01:15 PM
A lot of my students come to me to for dressage lessons on their foxhunters.Basically, I help them to develop their horses' hindquarters and become better balanced and off their forehand. Once we have established this, coupled with the riders' understanding of the seat and leg aids (so many of them are too much hand)I do a lot of caveletti and grid work, both on level ground and up and down hill. The horses and the riders are much happier and safer in the hunt field as a result.. In essence, what your dressage person was telling you has a lot of truth to it, as there are many, many foxhunt riders who rarely take any form of instruction .

Delphi
Mar. 2, 2006, 04:51 PM
many, many foxhunt riders who rarely take any form of instruction .

Hay! I resemble that comment!

But realy, foxhunting horses are siants! After all, who but saints could put up with most foxhunting riders?

Jaegermonster
Mar. 2, 2006, 05:23 PM
I think alot depends on who you hunt with and where. I have found in my experience hunting that you get a wide variety of riders and just as wide a variety of horses, and an even wider variety of skills and abilities.
Our hunt has people who have/still are actively eventing, pony clubbers, pleasure trail riders, hunter riders, and on and on. We even have a few who have never had a lesson in their lives and don't care for any thank you very much. The horses are just as varied. Personally, if I am going to do something I like to try to learn as much as I can and to do it correctly. I come from a hunter background, grew up showing as a kid for years and years and now just foxhunt. But I still have good, albeit rusty after all these years, basics and take lessons when I can. Then we have others who can ride well enough to stay on their long suffering saint of a horse and that's good enough for them.
I guess one of the most positive things about hunting is that it isn't a competition. As long as you are respectful of the hunt, and the hounds and you and your horse aren't a danger to yourself or anyone else it's ok. Some people ride to hunt, others hunt to ride, that's just the way it is.

J Swan
Mar. 2, 2006, 05:57 PM
I remember some joke going around that described the attitude of the riders of each discipline. Show hunters didn't like the field hunters because they ran their horses at fences, field hunters didn't like the show hunters because they couldn't get over a course if their trainer didn't tell them how many strides there were, no one liked the dressage riders because they didn't ride real horses - remember that one? It was pretty funny. Maybe because it held a kernel of truth - I dunno.

I've seen some of the best riding in the hunt field. I mean really classy, elegant, lovely equitation. Poetry in motion. I've seen people that could use a little help (me among them to be honest) etc. And the horses - well - you know - a field hunter is priceless. Which is why I had to make my own - can't afford one.

I think a lot of people who complain about field hunters are also the ones insisting that their clients take endless lessons, only do certain shows, get rid of a horse that doesn't have whatever the trainer thinks it needs to have (but they just happen to have the perfect horse for you) etc. Or maybe they have become so used to the arena, perfect footing, and the desire to show that they forgot what a good cross country gallop feels like. If they ever knew it at all.

Oddly enough, I think many of these apparantly substandard horses end up in the hunt field - where they carry their riders boldly and joyfully over hill and dale - with the wind in their manes and the sounds of the horn and thundering hooves in their ears. The riders may not have the perfect equitation, but they can get their horse fit, keep it sound, take a fence at high speed in uncertain footing without batting an eye (although a stiff drink afterward is an option)

Perhaps I'm romanticizing - yeah - almost time for bed. Sleepy. Sorry.

I recently saw my old dressage instructor - I learned a lot from him. But he was strict - I was forbidden to canter my horse for a year (yeah - like that was going to happen)

Anyway - he told me how disappointed he was to hear I took up hunting and how I'd wasted all the money I'd spent on dressage training. I said no way - I use more dressage in the field than I ever did in the arena. He looked surprised.

But really - there are all kinds of horses and riders hunting - and the skills and abilities vary. I'm not an adrenaline junkie myself - but there is a bit of an "extreme sport" aspect of foxhunting that many people just don't identify with. That's perfectly ok. As much as I love dressage - I'd rather apply it as it was meant to be used than practice it endlessly. Just my preference.

As far as the field hunters not training their horses to jump properly - consider this. If your horse messes up in the arena you knock a rail down. Foxhunting - a mistake can kill you. Those coops and fences are meant to keep livestock in. They don't budge. And you are far from ambulances and helicopters. Nah - the horses may not be flashy jumpers - but they're good ones. Generally. If not - they hilltop.

Delphi
Mar. 2, 2006, 06:40 PM
I have overheard instructors (Was I taking a lesson?) criticize riders after foxhunting: seat has reverted to a more defensive posture.

I have heard instructors criticize a horse taken hunting: horse is not paying enough attention to rider and rider is giving indistinct signal.

Well, thats foxhunting. The rider sits there and enjoys the scenery while the horse does all the work of getting from where you are to where you want to be. Speed, terrain and obstacles fall under "duty of horse" while enjoying scenery and sights fall under "duty of rider". Its lucky horses enjoy foxhunting as much as us and willing to take us with them.

Not show hunter stuff. Not dressage.

J Swan
Mar. 2, 2006, 06:51 PM
Delphi - that's priceless! "seat has reverted to a more defensive posture". Damn straight. No way in heck am I posing over a jump. I have enough trouble already.

Dressage, hunters, jumpers, eventing, - those are disciplines. Foxhunting is a job for a working horse. Completely different thing - although the horse and rider utilize aspects of every discipline when foxhunting. Not as pretty, perhaps - but effective. And in the field - effective works.

A confession - I've only hunted 3 seasons and cheerfully defer to the more experienced foxhunters.

xeroxchick
Mar. 3, 2006, 02:42 AM
That same attitude contributes to the idea that because you have jumped/evented/(fill-in-the-blank) the horse, you must be able to hunt him.
So people show up never having, say, galloped in a group.
Actually, most people are surprised that fox hunting even exists, even horse people. They think we all bring a "dog" and carry guns. No kidding.
As far as lessons and form goes, I find that the more correct your form the safer and more efficient the occasion. btw, I have *awful* form over fences but at least I recognise it and endlessly endevor to imporve!

Badger
Mar. 3, 2006, 03:17 AM
I'm laughing at the "defensive riding" comment, because the first time I took a lesson with a 4-star eventer from Britain, he watched me for about 5 minutes and said, "Right. Well. You have obviously been riding a lot of green horses and foxhunting and you have excellent defensive riding technique. That's great, we don't want to take that away from you, but you don't need to ride like that ALL the time. You can ride with a bit more finesse most of the time, and you'll find those defensive skills are still there the moment you need them." LOL

You do find a huge range of riding ability and horse training in the hunt field, as Jaegermonster said. People have different standards of what they'll put up with from a mount, and what they expect from them. The longer I've hunted the higher my standards have become. When I think about some of the greenies I rode when I was young and fearless and broke and had just started hunting, well, you'd better believe I developed some serious defensive riding techniques or, quite frankly, I wouldn't be here today! Almost two decades later, I do not want to deal with that crap anymore. Older and wiser. Those techniques are there in a pinch, but not something I need every hunt any more.

Jaegermonster
Mar. 3, 2006, 03:22 AM
I have to say everyone that has posted is pretty much right on. When I first discovered foxhunting about 8 years ago, it was a whole different style of riding that I never really knew existed. It made my horse much braver and bolder, and it made me much stronger and tight as a tick over fences. And you absolutely do learn to ride alot more defensively and not pose-y. Catching your horse at a show in a ring is one thing, catching it in thousands of acres of hunt territory is another entirely http://chronicleforums.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif
Now the jumps that used to be scary to me at shows are like "Is that it?", and it's almost offensive they are called "hunter" shows. Most of those horses and riders have never seen a hunt field and couldn't handle it if they did. Note I said most and not a slam at any trainers or anything, I know many trainers do hunt and do it well. But the little mistakes and incorrectness that you can hide or get away with at a show could get you killed in the hunt field when you're tearing along at a dead gallop flying fences with 50 other horses. And forget about this recent trend of lying down on the horses neck over fences (which also looks yucky to me by the way)
I really think most people that have those prejudices about hunting either a) don't know what they are talking about because they are too chicken to try it, or b) are jealous of those of us that hunt so talk badly about it http://chronicleforums.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

armandh
Mar. 3, 2006, 04:11 AM
trainers and boarding barns that rely on training income do not favor fox hunters [generalization, sorry] clearly there is little training revenue from those who want to just rest before the next meet and let down all summer. I just retired my horse (http://members.arstechnica.com/x/armandh2/coop2.jpg) after 10 years of hunting. outside of working with a trainer the year after purchase, I am one of those fox hunters who has avoided the training cult, where the training is the end product, ribbons are the measuring stick, and fun/cost ratio minuscule. looking at a new horse sunday.

wateryglen
Mar. 3, 2006, 06:52 AM
Your thoughts on prejudices existing are right on I think. Somehow we are more comfortable with just our own kind! I prefer the company of foxhunters absolutely! And that snobbishness to me means they just don't understand....or get it...or even had the chance to try it. Different strokes! I really admire those of you who venture out into "dressage-land" or "eventing-land"! Isn't it SCARY!!?? http://chronicleforums.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif
But I do, of course, think the other disciplines are much, much more snobby or haughty about their endeavors than we foxhunters! We are friendlier! Well....some of us are!!

SteeleRdr
Mar. 3, 2006, 07:03 AM
Originally posted by Delphi:

Well, thats foxhunting. The rider sits there and enjoys the scenery while the horse does all the work of getting from where you are to where you want to be. Speed, terrain and obstacles fall under "duty of horse" while enjoying scenery and sights fall under "duty of rider". Its lucky horses enjoy foxhunting as much as us and willing to take us with them.



Personally, as someone who is young, but has been foxhunting for 8 years and around foxhunters (the horses) for 12 (I'm only 22), by saying that I just sit there in the field is kind of insulting, and most that are on here should take offense. I have made nearly every horse I have ridden out hunting, minus one horse that I had to ride becasue no one would ride him because although he is a seasoned hunter, he is a pain in the ass. Anyways, I have a 6 y/o TB that is wonderful and one of the most comfortable rides you will ever have out hunting, but if you just "sit there and enjoy the scenery," you may end up in a tree or on the ground. I'm not out there for the scenery, I'm out there for the sport and the hounds, and I know to most this sounds crazy coming from someone who is young, but that is how I was raised. I know I'm not going to go out and win an equitation championship, but I do try to look good over fences because you end of getting hurt if you do something wrong. Foxhunters are priceless, but they can make mistakes too.

As for training, every horse I train is first started on trails, and jumped over logs to teach them they can't crash through jumps. Then they go in the ring where they start their dressage work and grid work. Also, after working with a race horse trainer for years, every horse of mine is fit to go hunting and is worked on hills so we don't lag behind out hunting.

And as for foxhunters not being pretty, some don't, I agree. But, go tell that to Beth DeStanley, or Elise Daniels, who both show the "big stuff." Not to mention the top eventers that foxhunt. The master we board horses for is one of the most stylish foxhunters I have seen, and come to find out he used to be a big time jumper rider. Go figure. He also expects his horses to hunt, but be able to do other stuff just as well.

Have any of you been to any Hunt Nights? I don't see any of those winning teams looking "sloppy" over fences.

Sorry to rant, but it kind of irritates me when foxhunters get generalized, just as show hunters, eventers, and dressage people do.

Delphi
Mar. 3, 2006, 07:12 AM
Not everyone agrees what combination of notes and tone make music. One may listen for a while and conclude it could be music if just developed better in a different way. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions and "prejudices".

Dessage is opera (lots of drama)

Show hunter is pop song ( rhythm, short lyric then repeat)

Western pleasure is country (some one done me wrong song)

Foxhunting is jazz ( it just happens ).

Equibrit
Mar. 3, 2006, 07:32 AM
Well - I hunt my horses in the winter, show them in dressage in the summer and take jumping lessons between shows. What does that make me?

My horses hunt on the bit, are forward in dressage, and don't rush fences!

SteeleRdr
Mar. 3, 2006, 07:51 AM
I'm with you Equibrit...horses can be multitalented...

Opinions are great and to each their own, and prejudices are there...what is being said here is more of a stereotype than an opinion or prejudice.

Equibrit, your horses are well rounded, which is why they are probably some of the best foxhunters!

Red Hunter
Mar. 3, 2006, 09:03 AM
bovon -

There are quite a few prejudices about foxhunters and their mounts. I run into this all the time. I have hunted for many years and have capped with numerous hunts and the dressage instructor's comment with respect to a lot of foxhunters not training their horses how to jump properly is very inaccurate.

A number of foxhunters come from hunter/jumper backgrounds, dressage backgrounds, eventing, etc. Their mounts, also have had been trained to jump properly. You will get a few riders/mounts that do not have perfect form over the fences, but that does not matter out the hunt field -- as long as they execute the jump safely and don't hold up the rest of the field -- That is what is important in foxhunting.

J Swan
Mar. 3, 2006, 09:17 AM
Equibrit - stop - you're messing up the streotype about foxhunters! What you are is a good horseman and your horses are well-trained mounts.

I'm one of those people that can't ride worth a damn regardless of discipline. Lessons can't make up for a complete and utter lack of talent. I mess up the bell curve I guess - maybe people like me are the ones people refer to when they talk about poor riding in the hunt field.

Scaredacoops
Mar. 3, 2006, 09:48 AM
Great topic! I am one who does take lessons, mostly during the off season, and feel it is an absolute necessity for me. I have a young Perch/TB that I just started this past year as a hilltopper, and although he's been great, we have plenty to work on.

Last weekend I observed the first flight taking a rather large coop downhill into a big open cow pasture. Horses were pulling, rushing,refusing, overjumping and hanging their hind feet on it. There was every type of rider form you could imagine. Then there was the cute, fit mare, out for her 3rd time, at the very back of the field who strided evenly to the coop, and jumped it perfectly! So did her rider. I happen to know that this pair works consistently in the ring and X-country. It shows and is paying off in the hunt field.

Anyone see the article in the March issue of "Covertside", "It's About Horses...Pulling and Rushing"? Great article on schooling for hunt horses and riders.

Happy hunting everyone!

bovon
Mar. 3, 2006, 11:18 AM
This has been an interesting thread..thanks for all the posts. I take lessons as often as I can afford to 3-4 times per month.. dressage and jumping lessons alternately..I have to otherwise I'd get killed out in the open field. I also work my horses up and down hills and out in the woods as much as I can. Some of us need alot of help with riding! One thing I like about foxhunting (in my very limited esperience) is that I get to expose my horse and myself to something new plus work on our abilities together. I always hope we'll be up to the task but at the same time I don't have to think about being judged and scored like at an actual show. Plus it's outside with nature and hounds and other horsey people and this may be weird but I just love the turn-out especially the pink coats. (It's about the only activity I like getting "dressed up" for otherwise I'm kind of a jeans and sweatshirt gal) That's just way too cool and beautiful with the horses and the hounds. So here I am like a kid counting the days till I can foxhunt again..

vickyrider
Mar. 3, 2006, 11:19 AM
I hunted for most of my childhood though I stopped in my mid-teens because of discovering boys http://chronicleforums.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_eek.gif and because the antis started to become VERY agressive in England at that time. However I have hunted as an adult occasionally since, and in all those years I have seen the widest variety of riding abilities in the hunting field than anywhere else in the equestrian world.

Once I was asked to take the wife of one of my husband's business friends hunting (now that is business entertaining!). I can be a bit of riding snob at times but honestly this lady was over the top. I guess she wanted to go back to London after weekend and brag she'd been hunting. Anyway, I was assigned to bring her back alive http://chronicleforums.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif, even though she had hardly ridden before but a good hunt livery fixed her up with a giant school master who looked after her safely for a full morning, and she had an absolute ball on him. BUT she really did just sit there and the horse did everything. There was I escorting her on my tiny 15.2 welshx, covered in mud and sweat, but I promise you she still looked pretty immaculate (well, relatively) by comparison when we returned. The horse was so big and really had just stepped over the hunt jumps, while over the same fences I had been flailing away with whip and spurs on my little chap!

But if you had put this same lady on my boy over 2.6 pole fences in an arena she wouldn't have lasted the first fence - she really was that bad a rider - but in the field on a sure footed experienced hunter she looked like she had been hunting all her life.

I have also seen many regular 'rich city' hunters who really do 'just ride to hunt'and are absolutely oblivious to the feelings of their mounts - cantering on tarmac roads or coming back not caring that their horse's legs are either lame or bleeding heavily.

BUT at the same time I have many friends who hunt who have very little money, and ride superbly and would never over extend their horse out hunting or ride while lame. You really can't generalise.

Equibrit
Mar. 3, 2006, 11:56 AM
The nice thing about hunting is that it really does not matter! The only forfeit for eating dirt was to purchase champagne!

Red Hunter
Mar. 3, 2006, 01:13 PM
My hunt had the same forfeiture for falling off - bottle of champagne, and not the cheap stuff either.

armandh
Mar. 3, 2006, 03:39 PM
Originally posted by SteeleRdr:
by saying that I just sit there in the field is kind of insulting, and most that are on here should take offense.

well yes and no
when you and your mount have hunted enough that the responses of the horse are almost automatic, waiting only for a turn of the head or slight nudge, then you are able to leave the going to the horse and enjoy the hunt more. as you note, it takes time to train to that level.

J Swan
Mar. 3, 2006, 05:51 PM
armandh and SteeleRdr - that's what I took the post to mean. Not that the rider is merely a passenger - but that the horse doesn't need to be micromanaged or finagled and the rider doesn't have to have this intense focus on the horse. The horse knows its job.

When I relate stories about the day's hunting to non hunting friends, they express amazement that I can gallop across a field without strong contact, or that my horse isn't freaked by hounds jumping out of hedges or running between his legs, or that I'd jump a coop without making sure the footing was good on the other side, etc. My good friend who focuses on dressage will not take her horse out of the arena. Never. Trail rides would "ruin" her dressage.

Just different worlds.

armandh
Mar. 3, 2006, 06:45 PM
that is the distressing part, horses so dull from endless trips around the indoor, riders taking ever more lessons only to demonstrate that they have advanced their horse to the next level of training. what a waste, forever training without an end use. a green horse might need a few lessons but if they will go, jump, and stop the rest is OJT. of course some of our members like Maria are in to other riding disciplines scroll down to the 3rd and 4th photo (http://www.sellefrancais.org/awards.htm) but i think they and their horses enjoy both the hunt and the event.

PiedPiper
Mar. 4, 2006, 05:09 AM
Hmm, most eventers I know think it is quite a coup to be able to hunt as well. It is the best way to have a well rounded eventer and something I hope to do with my new guy in a year or two. Nothing teaches your horse better on differing terrian and thinking on their feet like hunting.

Equibrit
Mar. 4, 2006, 05:36 AM
I found that sitting out in the boonies whilst whipping-in is a great dressage "schooling" opportunity! Thrashing through the woods is also a good time to school flying changes!

J Swan
Mar. 5, 2006, 03:39 AM
Equibrit - That's how I taught my horse flying changes! Weaving in and out of trees during roading and cubbing when things aren't light speed yet.

xeroxchick
Mar. 5, 2006, 05:17 AM
Vickyrider, what a great story. We have several people in our hunt who began riding in their fifties in order to hunt and have (expensive) very made mounts who cart them around the hunt field. I actually think the best thing these riders can do is just sit there and not interfere with the horse. They still fall off because even the best hunter will have to pop a ditch occasionally and those riders can't stay on. All in all, better than snatching and pulling and ruining these wonderful babysitters.
I've seen very few horses be able to "do it all." But they do exist. Ranch work is probably the closest thing to foxhunting, so I could see a good ranch horse also being a good field hunter. A lot easier for the horse to go from the hunt field to the show ring than from the show ring to the hunt field. Is that why we're misunderstood?

EasterEgg
Mar. 6, 2006, 04:37 AM
I think the 'non-multitasking horse' must be a north american phenomenon...

I can't speak for continental Europe but in the UK and Ireland horses (and riders!) generally do do a bit of everything.

My 14.2 hunted, evented, showjumped and competed in showing classes. I have also hunted a friend's 4* event horse who also won the working hunter championship at the Royal International as a 5 year old and showjumped up to 1.40m.
Said friend also has a horse who was best mare in the Burghley Young Event Horse final about 3 years ago. Her 14 year old daughter competes this mare very successfully in Intermediate (ie 15 - 15.2h) Working Hunter classes, while mum events her at novice level and showjumps up to 1.30m, and also hunts her in the winter.

As vickyrider said, there are obviously people who only ride to hunt, and therefore probably wouldn't win any style awards, but I think they know that and couldn't care less!

I also think US 'hunter' classes are a bit of a joke in that they bear no relation to hunting whatsoever - perhaps they should be renamed 'show horse over fences' or something similar? Then 'hunters' could be reclaimed by those horses who can actually hunt!

J Swan
Mar. 6, 2006, 04:53 AM
I also think US 'hunter' classes are a bit of a joke in that they bear no relation to hunting whatsoever - perhaps they should be renamed 'show horse over fences' or something similar? Then 'hunters' could be reclaimed by those horses who can actually hunt!

Amen, sister girl.

Elghund2
Mar. 6, 2006, 05:59 AM
I know we get sloppy during the hunt season. So when the season is over we'll do some light work for a month. Then we do dressage work and jumpers during the summer. But that's just so that we're ready to go for the next hunt season.

I can understand jumpers and eventing but I don't get dressage and hunter competitions. Seems like an awful lot of work just so that you can ride for two minutes at a very slow pace.

Foxhunt4me
Mar. 6, 2006, 09:28 AM
" I can understand jumpers and eventing but I don't get dressage and hunter competitions. "

All the DQ's and HQ's know that its not about how LONG you ride, its about how GOOD you ride. And of course, high scores and ribbons are pretty nifty too......

Equibrit
Mar. 6, 2006, 10:09 AM
I think the 'non-multitasking horse' must be a north american phenomenon... Non multi-tasking riders are the problem!



I can understand jumpers and eventing but I don't get dressage and hunter competitions. Seems like an awful lot of work just so that you can ride for two minutes at a very slow pace.

Please don't use hunters and dressage in the same sentence - I think you should try dressage and then explain to me how slow the pace is!

Elghund2
Mar. 6, 2006, 10:37 AM
Equibrit: I've done dressage. NOt at high levels. I understand the value of it in training a horse. Just don't get it as an end goal.

bovon
Mar. 6, 2006, 10:44 AM
Ok..I've decided to take my spooky grey TB hunting on Wednesday. We went jumping out in an open field today and he listened nicely then we went back to the ring where he jumped a course and before that we did some basic dressage which I think is damn hard (ever try to make an absolutley perfect 20m circle..ugh..) but has made him a better all around horse. I took him to a hunter show last weekend where after trotting around 3x he said "screw it" and through in a couple of canter strides and a baby buck cause he was feeling good and getting bored. We did do a nice jump round though even though some brat called him a "backcracker" I'm not sure what that is but I don't think it was a compliment. Let me just say that if he does well on Wednesdasy or heck if we just survive and don't get too crazy I will be one proud mama. I'm trying to get him to be the best eventer/foxhunter he can be so wish me luck!!

dawglover
Mar. 6, 2006, 10:51 AM
riding him in an open field over jumps and some schooling in a ring is vastly different than foxhunting...lots more excitement and distractions on the hunt field, you may want to consider hilltopping him first. Had someone come out first flight on a greenie last weekend that got so wound up he thwacked a hound going past...not the way to get invited back!

bovon
Mar. 6, 2006, 10:56 AM
I plan on staying in the rear of the field. Just the fact that this horse is going is monumental as he use to spook at his own shadow..If you knew how he was two years ago you'd understand why I'm a bit gun-ho but of course I will be safe for everyone's sake. Of course if he loses his mind, I'll take him back home before it gets ugly.

vickyrider
Mar. 6, 2006, 12:53 PM
Vickyrider, what a great story

It was both one of the funniest and most stressful days of my life. We don't have kids so I'm only guessing but freting about whether she was going to kill herself at each fence or ditch must be the same worry experienced by a parent. And by the end of the morning I was even beginning to admire her, all her pluck and that but then she went and spoilt it all by saying something smug about the horse (who had just looked after her neck for three hours) not being all she had expected. http://chronicleforums.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_mad.gif

phoebetrainer
Mar. 6, 2006, 01:42 PM
I've heard people say about really good horses: "He's too good to be just a hunter", to which I usually reply, "A good hunter may be too good to compete".

We are approaching our hunting season and I have a new horse to start. The horse I have hunted for the last two years is now too valuable to hunt. We jump wire fences and he is now an extablished intermediate eventer. I cannot risk him getting injured, simply because he is awesome to hunt.

A really good hunter is hard to come by. They will gallop in a crowd, jump anything in front of them, take off from any terrain and then when the run is over will pull up and stand quietly or walk quietly home. A really good hunter could cross into any discipline and make a good job of it. (Except prehaps hunter jumping, because that is really about anything but the horse!)

The hunt field also makes really good riders. Take a young rider out hunting to see what they're really made of - most kids wouldn't cope.

J Swan
Mar. 6, 2006, 01:45 PM
bovon - don't fret about that nobody calling your horse a backcracker. Chances are that brat can't ride a horse to save her life. Folks often say nasty things because deep down - they're jealous or resentful or need to switch to decaf.

That's want my mom used to tell me.

I think it's a shame we tend to pigeonhole our horses. "dressage" horse "eventer" "hunter" - any average, reasonably sound horse should be able to do some lower level dressage, safely jump a few fences xc or in the arena, clip, tie, load and be good for the farrier and vet. Such a horse would indeed be a worthwhile candidate for foxhunting. Or any other horse sport.

bovon
Mar. 6, 2006, 02:58 PM
jswan..

for grins and giggles, I posted the "backcracker" question on the H/J forum since It happened at a H/J show and posters there say "it's a compliment?? Either way, I love my guy and he's going to be great on Wednesday..Iknow he wil iknowhewilliknowhewill..

Jaegermonster
Mar. 6, 2006, 03:49 PM
The backcracker thread/question is actually posted on three forums. I thought we weren't supposed to do that...
And everyone is giving the same answer anyway.

PiedPiper
Mar. 7, 2006, 04:43 AM
Um, backcracker is a good thing. And posted on eventing as well, why?

I guess I am a little confused why the snarky attitude about this kid? First off, who cares what an ankle-biter has to say. Secondly, why did you take it as an insult.

Just do your thing and no worries.

J Swan
Mar. 7, 2006, 05:02 AM
Sorry to confuse folks - I've heard the term used to describe inverted horses, or ones that chip in or pop over jumps, or ones that display poor bascule over fences and pop their riders right out of the saddle. But to be honest, I never really paid attention to what they were referring to - as at pretty much any ringside in the country there will be hen parties.

So I cheerfully defer to the other posters!

bovon
Mar. 7, 2006, 10:28 AM
Three different forums..shoot I didn't mean to,thought I deleted those other posts. Darn too busy smokin crack behind the barn to notice http://chronicleforums.com/images/custom_smilies/lol.gif.Why did I think "backcracker" might be an insult..Number one I wasn't familiar with the term, No.2 I've heard less than nice things about this horse ,some of it from instructors too. I've got a new instructor who is the first one to tell me not to sell this horse short because you never know what he might end up doing, Granted she doesn't blow sunshine up my A** BUT it's better than hearing "oh , he'll never be able to handle foxhunting" or "he doesn't extend enough for dressage" or "he's a lousy jumper"..I'm out to prove em all wrong and Already am starting to do that on a few things. Ah, I digress, really I was just curious about the definition of "backcracker" that's all.

dawglover
Mar. 8, 2006, 01:16 PM
Bovon, did you go hunting today?? How did your horse do?

Foxhunt4me
Mar. 9, 2006, 04:22 PM
"she doesn't blow sunshine up my A** "


ROFLMAO ! I love it. Thats a new one to me.

bovon
Mar. 9, 2006, 05:09 PM
Ya know it's my own damn fault I don't get much sunshine from this instructor because I told her just because I'm nearing middle age and trying something new I don't need to have unworthy compliments spilled on me while she cashes my check(s) I told her to give it to me straight,tell me what I needed to hear not what I wanted to hear. So yes, I did go foxhunting yesterday and I did not take my spooky grey TB because well he was frankly quite filthy and I didn't feel like cleaning him up so I grabbed my Bay ( hides dirt well) STB X and we had a wonderful time.. It was his first time out with the hunt and I think he settled in quite nicely for a first timer! Guess this means we'll have to go again :) Perhaps he's found his niche??

Frosty M
Mar. 12, 2006, 07:19 PM
comments about how hunters can't foxhunt; foxhunters can't do dressage, etc. I was lucky enough to come up through Pony Club, which teaches dressage, CC, stadium jumping, and stable/horse management. Our hunt had just spilt and my friends and fellow Pony Clubbers and I went with the "new" hunt. We teenagers kept it going the first few years. All our horses were versatile from their PC training. We would fox-hunt in the winter, and do Pony Club rallies and showing in the summer. In my experience, most horses are endlessly versatile- it's the owners who insist on putting them in little, tight, specialized boxes.