View Full Version : Difference in Lubrisyn and Conquer?
Paris
Aug. 7, 2009, 03:33 PM
Has anyone used both? differences? I'm using Lubrisyn on a horse, and don't really see much change.. so am wondering if Conquer is very different?
TIA
appychik
Aug. 7, 2009, 05:37 PM
I forget the thread, but do a search on here for Flex Force HA... there's a nice long thread that talks about this product and the fact that it works and is like a third of the cost of the other two you mentioned. I use the pellets, but most CoTH users use the liquid. Works amazingly well and it's cheap. Worth a shot at least. :yes:
3 is the limit
Aug. 7, 2009, 07:57 PM
I noticed the difference Lubrisyn was making once I took my horse off it...Was really surprised because I too thought it wasn't working. Now my horses and dogs are never without it. I have my 2 older guys on it for maintence and my 5 year old TB on it for preventative measures.
Lubrisyn has the largest molecular weight of all oral HA available. You can read about why this weight is important and how it impacts the body in the article "Will the real hyaluronan please stand up?" in the Journal of Applied Nutrition, vol 54, number 1, 2004.
Conquer has a molecular weight around 1.4 million daltons. Lubrisyn has a weight of 2.4 million daltons. (which is almost double).
Lubrisyn effects the body in 10-14 days while you need at least 30 days to see a difference with Conquer.
I hope this explains the difference in products.
3
vBulletin® v3.6.8, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.