columbus
Aug. 3, 2009, 09:36 PM
My friend was posting her sales video(and you don't want to hear how hard it was to get the few minutes of good video with a jokester not co-operating) and said it was 2 to 3 minutes long but took 2 hours to download on You Tube with a fast connection. We are working to get our collective acts together to do a good job selling horses. We are discovering that this is not so easy. Congratulations to those who do this marketing thing well. I seem to remember hearing there were better places to post these videos but I can't remember where. Any advice on how to make posting videos easier(quicker...much quicker)...or must we accept our fate. I won't be posting my videos at the library if it is 2 hours.
Also we have 1st, second/third level horses as far as training goes but in one case he is not fit to work at that level and in another case he has the training but has not shown yet. The fear is he shows and screws around and gets a bad score. I know that this is a big issue when we CALL horses as a certain level but there is no video proof or scores to back this up. What would you consider evidence of being ready for 3rd...or second...or 1st SHORT of a score at that level and how would you deliver that. My understanding is to keep the You Tube vids to 3 minutes(and with 2 hour load times I can see why). In the keep it short idea is it sufficient to spotlight the more difficult elements of the level. These are incredibly fun horses but sometimes that means they have a less conventional approach to the levels...they beg to do harder stuff. Don't want no stinkin 2nd level...I want CHANGES!!! Showing these things on a sales video might be counter productive but then it is why the horse are fun to train...and some times frustrating. What would you do. Thanks PatO
Also we have 1st, second/third level horses as far as training goes but in one case he is not fit to work at that level and in another case he has the training but has not shown yet. The fear is he shows and screws around and gets a bad score. I know that this is a big issue when we CALL horses as a certain level but there is no video proof or scores to back this up. What would you consider evidence of being ready for 3rd...or second...or 1st SHORT of a score at that level and how would you deliver that. My understanding is to keep the You Tube vids to 3 minutes(and with 2 hour load times I can see why). In the keep it short idea is it sufficient to spotlight the more difficult elements of the level. These are incredibly fun horses but sometimes that means they have a less conventional approach to the levels...they beg to do harder stuff. Don't want no stinkin 2nd level...I want CHANGES!!! Showing these things on a sales video might be counter productive but then it is why the horse are fun to train...and some times frustrating. What would you do. Thanks PatO