View Full Version : Saddle-nomics - a new theory!
Risk-Averse Rider
Jul. 4, 2009, 04:23 PM
As I was driving down to the local tack store to pick up a new-style gullet for the Wintec Pro Jump saddle, I was listening to NPR. And on the local news, Iheard that the town of Tempe (not too far south of here) is planning a major crackdown on drunk driving over the 4th of July holiday. Fines of up to $2500.
And I thought... "$2500. Hm. That's about what I'd need to buy a Black Country Quantum. Give or take."
So I was thinking... I can *SAVE* $2500 by *NOT* going to Tempe tonight and driving around drunk... so then I can justify a new 'spensive saddle.
Whaddaya think? :lol:
poltroon
Jul. 4, 2009, 04:26 PM
Now see, that's when it gets really dangerous. I think about all the things I might spend money, and am not spending money on... and then I think, "See, one <insert spending vice> isn't so bad!"
Risk-Averse Rider
Jul. 4, 2009, 04:43 PM
I didn't say it was a Nobel Laureate theory of economics, poltroon... :D
But I think it's a sign from on high that the amount is exactly what I've been carrying around in my mind as "too much to spend on a saddle".
mvp
Jul. 4, 2009, 08:26 PM
I think you'd have to be certifiably drunk and then actually outrun a cop before your "savings" would count. Otherwise, and like most economic theory, it's all pen, paper and handwaving.
bossmare18
Jul. 4, 2009, 08:40 PM
I love your thought process! I think what ever it takes to get a new saddle is worth it.
Good Luck!
Risk-Averse Rider
Jul. 4, 2009, 09:18 PM
I think you'd have to be certifiably drunk and then actually outrun a cop before your "savings" would count. Otherwise, and like most economic theory, it's all pen, paper and handwaving.And what's wrong with a little handwaving when it comes to justifying tack purchases???
:cool:
mvp
Jul. 4, 2009, 10:01 PM
Nothing wrong with rationalizing a new saddle. In fact, you can consider it your own personal contribution to our economy's recovery. Look at you: Doing more than theorizing after all!
Laurierace
Jul. 4, 2009, 10:51 PM
Actually by the time you add in lawyer fees and increased insurance you are closer to 15k so you can get a new horse too!
Risk-Averse Rider
Jul. 4, 2009, 11:23 PM
Actually by the time you add in lawyer fees and increased insurance you are closer to 15k so you can get a new horse too!DUDE!!!! I like your thinking!!!!!
Posting Trot
Jul. 5, 2009, 01:56 PM
I think you'd have to be certifiably drunk and then actually outrun a cop before your "savings" would count. Otherwise, and like most economic theory, it's all pen, paper and handwaving.
Now I was thinking that she'd have to be certifiably drunk and then decide *not* to drive, even though she might desperately *want* to go to Tempe. Then the next day she could drive (sober) to Tempe and buy the saddle there!
You could also think of the saddle-buying as your own personal economic stimulus plan. :D
Guilherme
Jul. 5, 2009, 02:26 PM
As I was driving down to the local tack store to pick up a new-style gullet for the Wintec Pro Jump saddle, I was listening to NPR. And on the local news, Iheard that the town of Tempe (not too far south of here) is planning a major crackdown on drunk driving over the 4th of July holiday. Fines of up to $2500.
And I thought... "$2500. Hm. That's about what I'd need to buy a Black Country Quantum. Give or take."
So I was thinking... I can *SAVE* $2500 by *NOT* going to Tempe tonight and driving around drunk... so then I can justify a new 'spensive saddle.
Whaddaya think? :lol:
Works for me! :lol:
G.
poltroon
Jul. 5, 2009, 07:02 PM
My problem is I tend to try to count those expenditures I didn't make more than once. :D
Oh, and Laurierace is totally correct. So plenty of room for sales tax and some new boots. ;)
vBulletin® v3.6.8, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.