View Full Version : Missing horses in 3/27 issue of Chronicle
skyy
Mar. 28, 2009, 08:04 PM
So, I am hoping to start discussion on this without annoying the Mods and getting the thread closed down. Does anyone have any info about the horses listed in the ad by the PI in this week's issue? Where do we start looking? If we found GG, certainly we can find some of these guys!
harr754
Mar. 29, 2009, 08:44 AM
I saw those ads and was wondering how it is that all those horses are missing? Do they all belong to the same person?
skyy
Mar. 29, 2009, 09:50 AM
A little odd that nothing has shown up on COTH before this. That's a lot of horses and upper level horses at that!
ShotenStar
Mar. 29, 2009, 10:00 AM
I find it interesting that the barn background in several of the photos is the same, which leads me to suspect all these horses were in a single person's / entity's control at some point. Business arrangement gone bad?
*Star*
hideyourheart03
Mar. 29, 2009, 10:57 AM
Wait... GG was found??
slp
Mar. 29, 2009, 11:53 AM
From what I read on another board, this is a dispute between a trainer and a client...JMO, but I don't think the COTH investigators need to jump in. ;)
skyy
Mar. 29, 2009, 11:56 AM
slp- Got it. Thanks for that info. Oh well, we'll have to wait for the next big mystery.... Can you tell that the weather is miserable where I am and I'm looking for diversion :)?
RNB
Mar. 29, 2009, 12:34 PM
But the COTH Super Sleuths are much cheaper.....and probably way more effective!!;)
scotchie
Mar. 29, 2009, 01:01 PM
Yes, RNB- the COTH sleuths were given a nice bit of space in the article about Good Guiness in the same issue! :)
Haalter
Mar. 29, 2009, 01:30 PM
this is a dispute between a trainer and a clientBingo. Principals involved have less-than-stellar reputations, not really surprising it's come to this. All around sketchy.
ShotenStar
Mar. 29, 2009, 02:12 PM
But the COTH Super Sleuths are much cheaper.....and probably way more effective!!;)
ah yes, CotH Super Sleuths will work for titillation only ....
*star*
trafalgar
Mar. 29, 2009, 09:01 PM
Can someone give us the particulars of this case?
vBulletin® v3.6.8, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.